Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: The NDIS is being given to "first nations peoples" because they are suffering Trauma from "colonisation" The NDIS is costing taxpayers 100 billion per year that's 273 million per day.
1. Summary of the results
The original statement contains several significant inaccuracies. The NDIS is not exclusively given to First Nations peoples due to colonial trauma - it is a broader disability support scheme for all Australians with disabilities [1]. The claimed cost of $100 billion per year is also incorrect - the actual cost is $48.5 billion this financial year, projected to reach $63.4 billion by 2028-29 [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The relationship between the NDIS and First Nations peoples is more complex than suggested:
- The NDIA has developed a specific First Nations Strategy 2025-2030 aimed at making services more accessible and culturally appropriate [2]
- There are documented challenges regarding:
- Cultural differences
- Service accessibility
- Need for culturally sensitive support [3]
- Academic research has focused on how NDIS accounting practices might systematically impact First Nations communities, suggesting structural rather than purely historical issues [4]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement appears to contain several biased elements that could mislead public understanding:
- It oversimplifies complex issues by reducing First Nations' participation in NDIS to colonial trauma, when the reality involves multiple systemic and practical considerations [4]
- The statement significantly inflates costs by more than double the actual figures [1]
- It implies an exclusivity that doesn't exist - the NDIS is a national disability scheme available to all eligible Australians [1]
This type of misinformation could benefit groups seeking to:
- Create division around indigenous support programs
- Generate controversy about government spending
- Undermine public support for the NDIS by exaggerating its costs