Did the National Endowment for Democracy fund groups involved in the Nepal uprising?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Leaked files reviewed and reported by The Grayzone and republished across several outlets claim the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its partner the International Republican Institute (IRI) funded youth‑organizing and training programs in Nepal—programs that documents say spent roughly $350,000 on a “Yuva Netritwa” youth leadership project in 2021–22 and included smaller grants such as $9,135 for local research [1] [2] [3]. NED’s public FY2024 Asia grant listing also shows active, transparent grants for civic and media work in the region, while mainstream academic and reference accounts describe the September 2025 unrest primarily as a Gen‑Z reaction to a social‑media ban [4] [5].
1. What the leaked documents allege: NED/IRI trained Nepali youth ahead of the uprising
Reporting based on leaked internal documents—chiefly presented by The Grayzone and reiterated by outlets including ScheerPost, 21st Century Wire, Republic World and others—says IRI ran a program called “Yuva Netritwa: Paradarshi Niti” that received roughly $350,000 to train 60–70 emerging youth leaders, commission local research (about $9,135) and run organizing and digital‑media sessions between mid‑2021 and mid‑2022; those files are presented as evidence the U.S.‑funded network built capacity later visible in the September 2025 Gen‑Z protests [1] [2] [3].
2. What NED’s public records show: grants for civic engagement, media and regional advocacy
NED’s FY2024 Asia grant listing, available publicly, documents active grants in the region for governance, youth participation, media and democracy promotion—tasks described in the leak coverage, including projects to promote youth civic engagement, build youth centres and digital training, and to produce radio programming about Nepal’s political transition [4] [6]. Separate grant listings note efforts by Forum‑Asia to mobilize regional support for restoring multi‑party democracy in Nepal [7].
3. The counterpoint: mainstream accounts emphasize spontaneous anger over a social‑media ban
Academic and reference reporting framed the Gen‑Z unrest primarily as a rapid response to the government’s decision to block 26 social platforms in September 2025 and as part of a broader pattern of youth uprisings across the region; these accounts document immediate causes, chronology and public grievances rather than foreign orchestration [5] [8]. Britannica and Harvard analyses focus on the social‑media ban as the spark that ignited widespread protests [5] [8].
4. Causal certainty versus correlation: what the sources do—and do not—prove
Leaked IRI/NED documents, as presented in these reports, demonstrate funding, training and program design aimed at youth civic engagement and movement building; outlets interpret those activities as preparatory to political mobilization and, in some pieces, as contributing to the later unrest [1] [2] [3]. However, available sources do not present direct documentary proof in the provided corpus that those specific NED‑funded trainings ordered or commanded the September 2025 uprising or that grant money directly purchased weapons or orchestrated violent acts [1] [2] [3]. Mainstream sources documenting the protests focus on domestic triggers like the social‑media ban [5].
5. Motives, framing and implicit agendas in the reporting
The Grayzone and several republishers frame the story as evidence of U.S. “regime change” activity, a framing that aligns with their editorial line and is echoed by outlets with geopolitical critiques of U.S. influence [1] [9] [3]. Other reporting—academic and encyclopedic—emphasizes internal dynamics and immediate policy triggers; these sources do not explore the leaked documents in detail in the provided set [5] [8]. Readers should note both the leaks’ geopolitical implications as presented and the different editorial agendas of outlets republishing them.
6. What remains unclear and where investigators should look next
The public NED grant listings prove that U.S. democracy promotion money supported youth civic projects in the region and in some cases in Nepal [4] [6] [7]. The leaked documents, as cited by several outlets, detail an IRI program and specific expenditures that suggest capacity‑building for youth mobilization [2] [3]. What is not found in the current reporting set: independent forensic verification linking those programs to operational command of the protests, or official NED/IRI responses to the specific leaked documents included here—available sources do not mention an official denial or contextual rebuttal from NED within this corpus [1] [2] [3].
7. Bottom line for readers
Available reporting shows NED and its affiliates funded and ran youth‑focused civic programs and trainings in Nepal that the leaked files’ publishers argue primed networks later visible in the Gen‑Z protests [1] [2] [3]. But mainstream academic and reference accounts identify the immediate cause of the September 2025 unrest as the government’s social‑media ban and domestic grievances [5] [8]. The documents raise serious questions about foreign roles in political mobilization; they do not, in the sources provided here, conclusively prove a direct operational chain of command from U.S. grants to the violent events of September 2025 [1] [2] [3] [5].