Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did New Jersey officials and Muslim community leaders respond to Trump’s 2015 allegation?
Executive summary
Donald Trump’s 2015 claim that he saw “thousands” of Muslims in Jersey City cheering the 9/11 attacks drew sharp pushback from New Jersey officials and was widely debunked by fact‑checkers; Governor Chris Christie and fact‑checking outlets said there is no contemporaneous evidence supporting Trump’s account [1] [2]. Muslim community leaders and mainstream fact‑checkers at the time documented that reports of celebrations were unverified or based on rumor, and emphasized that many 9/11 victims and subsequent attacks affected Muslims as well [3] [2].
1. How officials in New Jersey publicly rejected the claim
New Jersey’s political leadership, including then‑Governor Chris Christie, directly disputed Trump’s account, saying that if such a mass celebration had occurred they would have remembered it — a rebuttal echoed by multiple news outlets and Reuters coverage that reported Christie’s skepticism and other officials’ disputes [1] [4]. National reporters cited New Jersey public records and contemporaneous reporting from 2001 that found only persistent rumors and isolated, unverified allegations — not clear, documented mass celebrations — prompting official rebuttals [2] [3].
2. Fact‑checkers and journalists found no supporting evidence
Independent fact‑checkers investigated Trump’s 2015 statement and concluded it was unsupported by the historical record. PolitiFact’s review and other fact‑checking organizations searched news archives from Sept. 11–Dec. 31, 2001 and found rumors and some local unverified allegations but no credible documentation of thousands of Muslims in Jersey City cheering the collapse of the World Trade Center [2] [3]. Reuters and FactCheck.org both reported that the assertion had been debunked and that Trump nonetheless defended the comment [1] [3].
3. How Muslim community leaders responded and the broader community reaction
Available sources do not provide extensive direct quotations from specific Muslim community leaders in New Jersey about Trump’s 2015 claim, but reporting at the time emphasized that Muslim leaders were occupied with helping congregations and guarding against bigotry in the wake of 9/11 and contested broad, unverified allegations of celebration in U.S. Muslim communities [2] [3]. FactCheck.org documented that Muslim leaders were engaged in outreach and countering stereotypes after the attacks, which undercut narratives that American Muslim communities broadly celebrated 9/11 [3].
4. The role of rumors, early reporting and why the claim spread
Journalistic reviews note that in the chaotic weeks after Sept. 11 persistent rumors circulated — including reports referenced in local papers about alleged celebrations in places like Paterson, N.J. — but those were never substantiated to the standard of confirmed news reporting [2] [3]. Fact‑check investigations emphasized that the post‑9/11 environment saw many unverified claims amplified on talk radio and online, creating the impression of broader phenomena that later could not be verified [2].
5. Trump’s defense and the media’s response
Trump repeatedly defended his 2015 statement, saying he was “100 percent right” and pointing to reports from “all over the world” of celebrations by Muslims after the attacks; Reuters covered his insistence even as news organizations and fact‑checkers found no supporting evidence for the Jersey City allegation [1] [4]. Media outlets and fact‑checkers continued to note the discrepancy between Trump’s personal claims and the archival record [2] [3].
6. Competing perspectives and lingering uncertainties
There are two competing narratives in available reporting: Trump maintained a personal recollection and global‑reporting rationale for his claim, while journalists, fact‑checkers and some New Jersey officials rejected the local Jersey City element as unverified or false [1] [2]. Available sources do not supply exhaustive documentation from every local leader or comprehensive interviews with Jersey City residents to fully close the historical question, but the mainstream journalistic consensus in the cited reporting is that the “thousands” claim lacked corroboration [2] [3].
7. Why this mattered politically and socially
The episode fueled debates over national security, immigration and Islam in American public life: Trump’s claim became a touchstone for his broader arguments about Muslim communities and informed both criticism of his rhetoric and defenses that invoked isolated, unverified reports and broader global coverage [1] [4]. Fact‑checking outlets framed their work as correcting public record and preventing unverified wartime rumors from shaping policy and public opinion [2] [3].
Limitations: reporting cited here focuses on published investigations and contemporary fact‑checks; available sources do not include every local statement by Muslim leaders in New Jersey nor exhaustive interviews with Jersey City residents, and thus some local reactions are summarized from the broader fact‑checking and news reporting rather than direct transcripts [2] [3].