Fact check: Was the governor of ny indicted today

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, the governor of New York was not indicted today. Instead, the sources reveal two separate high-profile indictments involving New York officials:

• Linda Sun, a former high-ranking aide to New York Governors Andrew Cuomo and Kathy Hochul, and her husband Chris Hu were indicted on bribery and fraud charges related to pandemic-era PPE procurement schemes ^{[1] [2] [3]}
• Eric Adams, the Mayor of New York City, was charged with bribery, campaign finance offenses, and conspiracy ^[4]

The confusion likely stems from the fact that multiple New York government officials have faced recent indictments, but none of these involve the current governor.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important context about the distinction between state and city government positions. The analyses reveal that:

• Linda Sun's indictment involves allegations of acting as a Chinese agent and accepting kickbacks in fraudulent schemes involving New York State government contracts ^{[1] [3] [2]}
• Eric Adams' charges relate to federal bribery and campaign finance violations at the municipal level ^[4]
• The current governor, Kathy Hochul, is not mentioned in any indictment proceedings, though her former aide Linda Sun faces serious charges ^[2]

The timing and nature of these separate cases may have created public confusion about which New York officials are facing legal proceedings.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears to be based on incomplete or confused information rather than intentional misinformation. The question may have arisen from:

• Media coverage conflation of multiple New York official indictments occurring in proximity
• Misunderstanding of government hierarchy - confusing mayoral, gubernatorial aide, and gubernatorial positions
• Rapid news cycle effects where multiple high-profile New York political indictments may have been reported simultaneously, leading to confusion about which specific officials were charged

The question itself is neutral and appears to be seeking factual clarification rather than promoting any particular narrative or bias.