Fact check: What influencers has Nick Fuentes worked with

Executive Summary

Nick Fuentes has collaborated or received visible support from a small set of right-wing and far-right influencers — notably Myron Gaines, Dinesh D’Souza, Vincent Oshana, and streamer Adin Ross — while also engaging in public feuds with higher‑profile conservative figures like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens; platform reinstatements and removals have repeatedly disrupted those interactions ^{[1] [2]}. Reporting also places Fuentes at the center of intra‑right conflicts (the “Groyper wars”) and platform controversies that complicate any simple tally of “who he has worked with” ^{[3] [2]}.

1. What the sources claim about Fuentes’ visible collaborations and endorsements — a quick inventory readers need

Multiple contemporary accounts list Myron Gaines, Dinesh D’Souza, Vincent Oshana and Adin Ross among figures who have appeared on Fuentes’ program, praised him publicly, or shown mutual support, indicating episodic collaborations or cross‑promotion rather than formal long‑term partnerships ^[1]. These interactions are reported as part of a broader far‑right online ecosystem in which hosts and streamers trade platform exposure, interviews, and endorsements; the sources frame these relationships as transactional and publicity‑driven rather than evidence of institutional alliances. The reporting dates for these claims are concentrated in September 2025, reflecting retrospective summaries and contemporaneous documentation ^[1].

2. When “appeared on his show” means something different from formal partnership — context and limits

The documents show appearances and praise, but they do not document formal business arrangements, long‑term co‑productions, or sustained campaign collaborations; “worked with” in the sources largely denotes media appearances or verbal support rather than contractual work ^[1]. The characterization matters: media ecosystems often reflect one‑off guesting and mutual amplification, which can be amplified by controversies and platform moderation actions. Several pieces explicitly discuss praise or guesting without citing contracts or joint ventures, so observers should treat “worked with” as shorthand for visible interactions rather than proof of a strategic alliance ^[1].

3. The other side of the ledger — feuds, rivalry, and the Groyper wars that reframed alliances

Reporting emphasizes public feuds between Fuentes and mainstream conservative figures like Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, casting Fuentes as both allied with fringe influencers and at odds with establishment conservatives ^{[1] [4] [3]}. The “Groyper wars” are central: these were organized efforts by Fuentes’ followers to confront and troll more mainstream conservative leaders, revealing ideological rifts and competition for influence among younger conservative audiences. Coverage from September 2025 situates Fuentes as a polarizing figure whose relationships fluctuate between cooperation and confrontation ^{[3] [4]}.

4. Platform access, reinstatements and takedowns — how moderation shaped who he could “work with”

Multiple sources recount episodes in which Fuentes’ and allied personalities’ accounts were reinstated or removed from major platforms like YouTube, directly affecting opportunities for collaboration and guesting; platform moderation cycles have been a practical gatekeeper for whom he can appear with and when ^[2]. The September 2025 coverage documents at least one incident where Fuentes and Alex Jones were briefly reinstated and then removed, signaling both the volatility of his online presence and the way takedowns constrain long‑term co‑production or recurring guest roles. The sources show platform actions as a recurring structural factor shaping alliances ^[2].

5. Disputes over narratives and a hacking episode that diverted attention

Later reporting in November 2025 details a hacking episode involving Fuentes’ X account and allegations about content posted by unknown actors, which Fuentes blamed on external actors while critics mocked the incident; such episodes complicate attribution and obscure who is actively collaborating versus who is simply mentioned in the same news cycle ^[5]. This type of operational confusion underscores a broader reporting pattern: many claims about “working with” stem from high‑visibility moments that do not always reflect ongoing cooperation. The November piece highlights how security incidents and mockery can reshape the public record independent of substantive partnerships ^[5].

6. What remains uncertain or omitted across the reporting — questions a careful reader should ask

The assembled sources do not present contracts, payroll records, recurring co‑production credits, or detailed timelines that would confirm sustained collaboration; absence of such documentation means the term “worked with” is best understood as episodic collaboration, guesting, or public praise ^[1]. The coverage also focuses on media moments and platform moves rather than private communications or financial ties. Readers should therefore distinguish between visible media interactions and institutional or financial partnerships, and seek primary documents if alleging formal collaboration.

7. Bottom line for fact‑seekers: concise judgment anchored in the evidence

The reporting supports a defensible, narrow conclusion: Nick Fuentes has publicly engaged with and been praised by select right‑wing and far‑right influencers — notably Myron Gaines, Dinesh D’Souza, Vincent Oshana and Adin Ross — and has been in public conflict with mainstream conservative figures; the documentation points to media appearances and ideological alignment rather than confirmed long‑term contractual partnerships ^{[1] [3]}. Platform moderation, intra‑right disputes, and episodic online incidents have been major factors shaping who he could collaborate with and when ^{[2] [5]}.