Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific comments has Nick Fuentes made about feminism?
Executive Summary
Nick Fuentes has repeatedly denounced feminism and expressed misogynistic views across interviews, livestreams, and social posts; the evidence compiled in the available analyses shows he framed feminism as a harmful liberal ideology and deployed slogans and rhetoric that directly mock women’s autonomy, such as “Your body, my choice. Forever.” Multiple contemporaneous reports characterize these statements as part of a broader anti‑liberal, white‑nationalist worldview that links opposition to feminism with his stances on race, religion, and social order [1] [2] [3]. The record includes reported public remarks, social posts with large audiences, and commentary during high‑profile interviews that drew mainstream attention and condemnation [4] [2].
1. How Fuentes Frames Feminism — A Direct Attack on “Liberal” Values
Coverage of Fuentes consistently describes his rejection of feminism as part of a larger denunciation of what he calls “liberal” values, where feminism is named explicitly as a symptom of societal decay linked to conspiratorial narratives about cultural subversion. Reports emphasize that Fuentes situates feminism alongside other targets—pluralism, diversity, and political pluralism—and attributes these changes to malign forces in society rather than to democratic social movements [1] [3]. This framing appears repeatedly in analyses that contextualize his statements within a white‑supremacist ideological package, making his anti‑feminist remarks not isolated cultural critiques but components of a coherent worldview that rejects gender equality as part of a modern political order [1] [3].
2. Specific Phrases and Social Posts — “Your body, my choice. Forever.”
The clearest attributable piece of rhetoric documented in the analyses is Fuentes’s viral social post reading “Your body, my choice. Forever,” which was circulated widely and analyzed as a targeted attack on reproductive autonomy and feminist advocacy online. Analysts note the post’s high view counts and its use as harassment rhetoric aimed at women and feminist movements, with watchdog groups highlighting how the slogan functions as a direct inversion of pro‑choice messaging to assert patriarchal control [2]. Media accounts link this slogan to a broader online campaign by Fuentes and his followers that weaponizes social media reach to amplify misogynistic messages, and the line is treated by multiple reports as a central, documented example of his anti‑feminist output [5] [2].
3. Public Appearances — Interviews That Amplified Misogynistic Claims
Public interviews, notably the appearance that drew attention on a major cable program, are reported to have contained statements where Fuentes described women as “the problem” and argued that they “naturally want strong men,” while blaming women’s choices on political arrangements that lack accountability. These characterizations were noted in contemporaneous reporting as explicitly misogynistic and were paired with commentators’ reactions that the segment normalized harmful gender stereotypes [4]. Analysts point to the interview as significant not only for content but for platforming: airing such views in mainstream venues increased visibility and prompted debate about amplification and responsibility, even when some outlets framed the content as part of broader culture‑war discussions [4].
4. Broader Context — Ties to White Supremacy and Antisemitic Conspiracy Narratives
Multiple analyses place Fuentes’s anti‑feminist rhetoric within a larger constellation of extremist beliefs, noting that his attacks on feminism are entwined with antisemitic and white‑supremacist claims that assign blame for societal changes to conspiratorial actors. Reports describe how Fuentes characterizes feminism as one component of a “bastardized” cultural shift allegedly engineered by hostile groups, making gender politics inseparable from his racial and religious scapegoating. This contextual linkage matters because it transforms gender critique into an exclusionary political program rather than a standard ideological disagreement, and it explains why civil‑rights groups and media watchdogs treat his comments as part of an organized extremist narrative [1] [3].
5. Divergent Reporting and What Is Not Directly Quoted — Gaps and Editorial Lenses
While several sources cite particular slogans and paraphrased claims from Fuentes, not all reports provide verbatim quotes, and some analyses caution that a portion of the record is paraphrase or interpretation of livestreams and posts rather than neatly archived transcripts. Certain outlets emphasize the misogyny and link it to extremism, while others highlight the controversy over platforming him on mainstream shows, producing debate about context and intent [6] [7]. This divergence matters for assessing the record: the strongest documented item is the social post slogan [2], supported by multiple reports, whereas other quoted claims appear across interviews and summaries where exact wording varies; readers should note these differences when weighing the precise textual record against consistent thematic portrayal.