Who is funding the NO Kings March for 18 Oct 25.
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The funding for the No Kings March on October 18 is not explicitly mentioned in most of the analyses provided [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. However, some sources suggest that the movement is being organized by a coalition of grassroots and advocacy organizations, including Indivisible, the ACLU, and others [2] [3] [4]. Some sources imply that the funding may come from wealthy individuals or organizations, such as George Soros and his Open Society Foundations [6], or Christy Walton, who promoted the protest through a full-page advertisement in the New York Times [7]. On the other hand, one source mentions that American Opposition, one of the groups behind the 'No Kings' protests, has received almost $13,000 in donations since its start in January, with the largest donation being $1,000 [8].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the lack of transparency regarding the funding of the No Kings March, as most sources do not provide explicit information on this topic [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Additionally, there are conflicting claims about the funding, with some sources suggesting that the movement is backed by wealthy individuals or organizations [6] [7], while others provide information on the grassroots and advocacy organizations involved [2] [3] [4]. Alternative viewpoints on the funding of the march are not well-represented, with some sources focusing on the organizational aspects of the movement [1] [2] [3] and others emphasizing the potential role of wealthy donors [6] [7]. It is also worth noting that the sources that mention funding or organizational support for the march often do not provide a clear picture of the financial situation, making it difficult to determine the extent to which the movement is funded by external sources [8].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement asks about the funding of the No Kings March, but does not provide any context or information about the movement or its organizational structure [1] [2] [3]. This lack of context may lead to misinformation or speculation about the funding of the march, as seen in some of the sources that imply a connection to wealthy donors or organizations [6] [7]. Bias may also be present in the way that some sources frame the funding of the march, with some emphasizing the potential role of wealthy donors [6] [7] and others focusing on the grassroots and advocacy organizations involved [2] [3] [4]. The sources that benefit from this framing are those that seek to emphasize the influence of wealthy donors on the movement [6] [7], as well as those that aim to downplay the role of external funding and emphasize the grassroots nature of the movement [2] [3] [4].