Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Were there notable wealthy individual donors or foundations backing the No Kings protests?
Executive summary
Reporting on who financed the October 18 “No Kings” protests is mixed: multiple outlets say progressive foundations and unions supported the events and name the Open Society Foundations/George Soros as a funder, including specific claims of grants ranging from about $3 million to larger amounts tied to broader philanthropy [1] [2] [3]. Other outlets and fact-checkers caution that viral claims that billionaires or foundations spent hundreds of millions to “directly fund” protesters are exaggerated or inaccurate [4] [5].
1. What the mainstream coverage reports: organized groups, unions and progressive foundations backed the events
Major news organizations and long-form reports describe No Kings as a coordinated mobilization run by a network of progressive organizations with backing from traditional progressive funders and unions. The Economic Times and The Guardian list progressive foundations (including George Soros’s Open Society Foundations), major unions like SEIU and AFT, and grassroots donors or community groups as funding sources or partners in organizing the nationwide demonstrations [2] [6]. BBC coverage frames the rallies as a broad Democratic/left coalition using established organizing infrastructure to turn protest energy into civic participation [7].
2. The specific Soros/Open Society claim — reporting diverges on scale and wording
Several outlets report that foundations connected to George Soros provided grants related to the protests. The Guardian and regional outlets cite right-leaning reports that a roughly $3 million grant to Indivisible from foundations linked to Soros supported the organizer’s social‑welfare activities tied to No Kings [1]. Hindustan Times and ABC6 relay Fox News reporting that links Open Society Foundations to support for the demonstrations, while The Economic Times lists Open Society among progressive funders [8] [3] [2]. Those sources present a consistent throughline: Soros‑affiliated philanthropy is named as one contributor — but they differ on the exact sum, purpose, and whether that funding was direct payment for protests or broader organizational support [1] [2] [3].
3. Fact‑checking and pushback: claims of massive billionaire spending are overstated
A dedicated fact‑check flags viral social media claims that billionaires spent extremely large sums (for example, assertions of hundreds of millions) directly funding No Kings protests as inaccurate or misleading. Snopes specifically disputes claims that groups backed by billionaires “spent $300M to fund protests,” while acknowledging that organizations with billionaire donors do support groups involved in organizing [4]. Wikipedia summarizing press reporting notes another claim of a roughly $3 million grant to Indivisible but does not corroborate any claims of sums in the hundreds of millions [5]. In short: reporting supports some organized philanthropic support, but not the viral, very-high-dollar narratives [4] [5].
4. How the money likely flowed — grants to groups, not direct payments to protesters
Available reporting indicates funding more commonly went to organizations (Indivisible, unions, advocacy networks) for organizing, communications, and social‑welfare activities rather than as cash disbursements to individual protesters. The Guardian and other coverage emphasize that Indivisible and partner groups “managed data and communications with participants” and that the protests were the product of an organizing coalition rather than a single funder paying for street actions [1] [6]. Fact‑checkers and encyclopedic summaries likewise treat alleged grants as organizational support, not direct sponsorship of every local event [4] [5].
5. Political framing and agendas in the coverage
Coverage of funding is highly politicized. Right‑leaning outlets and commentators portray any Soros connection as proof of orchestration or external manipulation [1] [9], while left‑leaning and international outlets frame foundation and union support as routine civic organizing. The fact‑checking angle seeks to correct inflated dollar figures but does not deny that organized philanthropy and unions have a role. Readers should note that outlets citing Soros often serve political narratives that treat his philanthropy as suspicious; conversely, some progressive outlets present the same funding as standard civic support [1] [6] [4].
6. Remaining gaps and caveats
Available sources do not give a unified accounting of total dollars specifically earmarked for the October 18 events, nor a line‑by‑line breakdown of grants to each local organizer [4] [5]. Some outlets repeat numbers (e.g., $3 million to Indivisible) while others report broader philanthropy totals for George Soros that reflect cumulative giving over decades rather than a single-protest budget [3] [5]. If you need a precise, auditable ledger of grants tied exclusively to No Kings, current reporting does not provide that level of detail [4] [5].
7. Bottom line for readers
Reporting across mainstream outlets, fact‑checks, and longform pieces agrees that unions and progressive foundations — including grants tied to Indivisible and mentions of Open Society Foundations — played roles in organizing or supporting No Kings, but the viral claim that billionaires spent enormous sums (hundreds of millions) directly to fund the protests is not supported by the available sources [2] [1] [4].