Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many people were arrested because of attacking another person at a no kings rally and list by state, you will proabably need to find law enforcement websites to get a factual number
Executive Summary
The available, analyzed records show no single authoritative, nationwide tally of arrests for attacking another person at “No Kings” rallies; available reporting and summaries conflict and document at least several discrete, verified arrests in different states but disagree on totals and scope. Local law-enforcement reports confirm individual incidents — a Denver aggravated-assault arrest and a Burnsville assault booking — while other local reporting shows larger localized arrest counts such as 14 arrests in Los Angeles, and aggregate summaries offer divergent totals ranging from 17 to 36+ across many sites; these discrepancies mean a reliable state-by-state list cannot be produced without consulting each jurisdiction’s official arrest records [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Small but verifiable incidents: single-case arrests that are documented and precise
Local law-enforcement sources supply the most concrete individual arrest information: Denver police booked Jose Cardenas on an aggravated-assault charge after video showed him attack a counter‑demonstrator, a corroborated single arrest tied directly to an assault at a “No Kings” event [1]. Similarly, the Burnsville Police Department reported arresting Randy Horton Jr. for assault inflicting serious injury after an alleged push injured a 73‑year‑old attendee; Horton was booked and released on bond, and the incident was dated to a June 14 event with booking reported June 19, 2025 [2]. These localized law‑enforcement entries are specific, attributable, and actionable, but they cover discrete incidents rather than producing a national aggregate.
2. Local aggregate reporting creates contrasting pictures: Los Angeles example
Municipal police media statements and local outlets reported larger group arrests at some urban rallies: the Los Angeles Police Department documented 14 arrests during a downtown “No Kings Day” protest, with reports noting juveniles among those detained and an officer injury, though charge specifics were not uniformly released [3] [6]. This LA figure is substantively larger than the single‑arrest examples, showing how different events within the same nationwide day of action produced widely varying law‑enforcement responses. The LA reporting is specific to a jurisdiction and illustrates how city-scale policing operations can yield a cluster of arrests unrelated to the individual assault incidents confirmed elsewhere.
3. Conflicting national summaries: totals vary and methodologies differ
Two summaries included in the analysis present different national totals. One aggregate reference notes 36+ arrests and three reported injuries overall but does not distinguish arrests for assault versus other offenses, and it lacks a state-by-state breakdown [5]. Another summary claims 17 arrests across five states — Utah, Texas, California, Florida, and Virginia — and lists a mix of charges including battery, assault, graffiti, trespassing, and hit‑and‑run, plus one Utah fatality; this summary attributes arrests to varied incident types and again lacks granular, jurisdictional source citations in the provided analysis [4]. These divergences underscore that different compilers used different definitions and data collection methods, leading to inconsistent totals.
4. Gaps and limits: why a reliable state-by-state list is not currently possible
The collected analyses repeatedly note the absence of a consolidated, law‑enforcement‑verified national dataset covering all ~2,700 demonstration locations; several sources explicitly state that only a subset of cities was examined and that official arrest records from each jurisdiction would be required to assemble an authoritative state-by-state list [7] [8]. The provided materials mix primary law-enforcement releases (Denver, Burnsville, LAPD) with media aggregates and secondary summaries that do not disclose raw arrest logs. Because of that methodological gap, any nationwide table produced from these materials alone would risk omitting verified arrests or double‑counting incidents.
5. What a rigorous count would require and potential agendas to watch
A rigorous state-by-state tally demands direct collection of arrest reports, booking logs, and public-safety press releases from each relevant police department or sheriff’s office, with attention to charge language distinguishing “attacking another person” from disorderly‑conduct, traffic, or property offenses; this is the only way to move from disparate local reports to an accurate aggregate. Analysts should also note potential agendas: some organizers and sympathetic outlets emphasize low arrest counts to portray peaceful turnout, while adversaries and some media emphasize violence and higher arrest totals; both tendencies can produce selective citation of jurisdictions and incidents [7] [4]. The path to certainty is open — but it requires systematic queries of every local law‑enforcement repository and official records requests where necessary.