Fact check: Is there a question on application for nobel peace did you ever use military force against your own people

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there is no evidence of a question on the Nobel Peace Prize application asking nominees whether they have ever used military force against their own people. The sources examined focus on various aspects of the Nobel Peace Prize process and specific nominees, but none mention such a screening question ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}.

The analyses reveal information about:

• The nomination and selection process for the Nobel Peace Prize ^{[3] [5]}
• Donald Trump's nominations and campaigns for the prize ^{[1] [2] [4]}
• American veterans who have received Nobel recognition ^{[6] [7]}
• The case of Aung San Suu Kyi, a Nobel Peace Prize winner whose reputation was later tarnished by military actions against the Rohingya minority in Myanmar ^[8]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important context about how the Nobel Peace Prize nomination and selection process actually works. The analyses indicate that the process involves nominations from qualified individuals and organizations, followed by evaluation by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, but no mention is made of specific application questions about military force ^{[3] [5]}.

A crucial missing perspective is that the Nobel Committee has historically awarded the prize to individuals who later became associated with controversial military actions. The case of Aung San Suu Kyi demonstrates this complexity - she won the Nobel Peace Prize but was later implicated in situations involving military force against the Rohingya people ^[8]. This suggests that either such screening questions don't exist, or they don't prevent controversial figures from receiving the award.

The analyses also reveal that political figures like Donald Trump actively campaign for the Nobel Peace Prize, which indicates the process may be more political than the original question assumes ^{[2] [4]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears to contain a false premise - it assumes the existence of a specific application question about using military force against one's own people, but none of the analyzed sources confirm such a question exists ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]}.

This could represent misinformation if the questioner believes such a screening mechanism exists when it doesn't. Alternatively, it might reflect a misunderstanding of how the Nobel Peace Prize selection process works - the question seems to assume there's a formal application with specific screening questions, rather than the nomination-based system that actually exists.

The framing also suggests potential bias toward assuming the Nobel Committee has more rigorous screening procedures than may actually be in place, given that controversial figures have received the award and later been associated with military actions against civilians.