Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How often are non-criminal immigrants detained and deported compared to criminal immigrants in recent years?
Executive Summary
Recent reporting and government figures show a clear tension: a large and growing share of people in ICE custody lack criminal convictions, even as removals increasingly emphasize those with convictions. Government snapshots from 2025 indicate that non‑criminal detainees have at times outnumbered criminal detainees — for example figures showing 71.5% of detainees with no criminal convictions as of September 21, 2025 — while analyses comparing removals across years show convicted criminals accounted for a rising share of formal deportations since the late 2000s. This means detention and deportation are operating on different logics: detention rolls increasingly include non‑criminals, while removals historically prioritize those with criminal histories, producing an apparent paradox that reflects shifting enforcement priorities, resource allocation, and administrative targets [1] [2] [3].
1. What advocates and researchers are claiming — a snapshot that grabs attention
Advocates, think tanks, and longform reporting converge on the claim that non‑criminal immigrants are frequently detained and represent a significant portion of ICE custody. Analyses cite figures like 65% of people taken by ICE having no convictions and 93% having no violent convictions, and other reporting that more than 70% of those in immigration custody lack criminal records. These claims emphasize family separations, large populations of U.S. citizens with undocumented parents, and human‑impact narratives to argue that interior enforcement increasingly sweeps up people without criminal histories. These assertions aim to show a shift away from a narrow focus on “dangerous criminals” toward broader interior enforcement that nets noncriminals as well [4] [5].
2. Government and press numbers that complicate the story
Official ICE snapshots and mainstream reporting complicate a simple narrative by providing concurrent but distinct metrics for detainees versus removals. ICE enforcement statistics and news stories from 2025 show that at certain points the majority of people in ICE detention had no convictions — figures such as 42,755 of 59,762 detainees lacking convictions as of Sept. 21, 2025 are cited — while removal statistics and longitudinal analyses show convicted criminals becoming a larger share of removals over time (FY2008 to FY2015 and beyond). The result is two coexisting facts: detention rolls can be dominated by non‑criminals even while deportation removals emphasize convicted individuals, reflecting operational differences between who gets held and who ultimately is removed [1] [2] [6].
3. Longitudinal trends and the policy drivers behind them
Longer‑term analysis shows a shift: convicted criminals comprised 31% of ICE removals in FY2008 and rose to 59% by FY2015, indicating a policy prioritization of criminal cases in removals. At the same time, recent enforcement surges, administrative removal targets, and expanded interior arrests have produced higher counts of non‑criminals in custody. That pattern reflects administrative priorities (removals targets), operational triage (who is charged and removed), and frontline practices (transfers from Customs and Border Protection and interior arrests). The divergence suggests enforcement resources are being deployed both to process criminal removals and to detain many non‑criminals pending case outcomes, decisions influenced by changing agency directives and target goals [2] [7] [8].
4. Competing explanations and possible agendas to watch
Different actors frame the numbers for political ends: advocacy groups highlight non‑criminal detention to argue for due‑process protections and limits on interior enforcement; some administrations emphasize criminal removals to justify tough enforcement; journalists and watchdogs point to administrative targets and error‑prone removals to highlight procedural risks. Each framing is rooted in selective emphasis: citing detention population shares can imply broad sweeps of non‑criminals, while citing removal shares can imply focus on dangerous offenders. Recognizing these agendas is essential to interpret claims: numbers can be accurate and yet highlight contrasting aspects of the enforcement system depending on what question is asked — who is detained right now versus who is formally removed over a fiscal year [4] [3] [8].
5. What the evidence supports and the key caveats for readers
The evidence supports two concurrent conclusions: non‑criminals make up a substantial—often majority—share of ICE detainees at specific points in 2025, and removals over recent years have increasingly prioritized individuals with criminal convictions. Major caveats include differences between point‑in‑time detention counts and year‑end removal tallies, variable definitions of “criminal” (convictions versus charges), incomplete publicly available data on case outcomes, and the influence of administrative targets. For a precise comparison of “how often” non‑criminals are detained or deported relative to criminal immigrants, more granular longitudinal data linking individual detention episodes to removal outcomes is required; current sources show a clear pattern but not a single unified rate comparison [1] [2] [4].