Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many non-voting delegates and residents are in the House in 2025?
Executive Summary
In 2025 the most consistent finding across the provided analyses is that the U.S. House of Representatives includes six non-voting delegates plus one Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, yielding a set of seven members with limited floor voting rights relative to the 435 state representatives; multiple summaries explicitly list American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, and one each for Puerto Rico and a seventh slot described variably as a delegate or Resident Commissioner [1] [2] [3]. Sources disagree on small details — some count six non-voting delegates and treat the Puerto Rico Resident Commissioner separately while others aggregate to “six non-voting members” including Puerto Rico — but the prevailing representation model described in 2025 material is six territorial/district delegates plus a Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, totaling seven limited-vote members [4] [5].
1. Why the count matters and where the confusion comes from
The counting discrepancy stems from terminology and historical distinctions between “non-voting delegates” and Puerto Rico’s “Resident Commissioner,” which functions like a delegate in committee and floor participation but has a distinct title and two-year or four-year election cycle differences; some sources list six non-voting delegates and then add the Resident Commissioner to reach seven, while other summaries tacitly include Puerto Rico in the six non-voting count, producing inconsistent tallies in plain-language summaries [1] [2]. The analytical documents show that jurisdictions represented in 2025 include the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, plus Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner, and that different repositories or fact checks will sometimes phrase the total as six or as six plus one, reflecting whether Puerto Rico is labeled among the delegates or singled out by title [1] [5].
2. What the authoritative role descriptions say about voting power
All provided analyses agree on the functional limitation: these members can introduce legislation, serve on committees, and speak on the House floor, but they cannot cast final binding votes on the House floor for the passage of legislation; that limitation is the practical reason why the label “non-voting” appears across the sources even as naming conventions vary [3] [6]. The distinction between committee participation and final-passage floor voting is central to understanding the influence of these members: committee work and floor recognition permit meaningful advocacy and procedural input, yet the absence of a final roll-call vote for passage means their formal legislative power is narrower than that of the 435 state-based representatives, a point reiterated across the practical descriptions in the provided materials [3] [4].
3. Which jurisdictions are represented and how sources list them
The set of jurisdictions consistently named across the analyses includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico (Resident Commissioner), American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands; several summaries enumerate these six territories/district plus Puerto Rico’s distinct office, while at least one analysis explicitly lists seven limited-vote representatives when counting the Resident Commissioner in addition to six delegates [1] [5] [6]. That uniformity on geography helps reconcile the numeric language: whether the total is framed as six non-voting delegates with an added Resident Commissioner, or as a combined seven limited-vote members, the same jurisdictions are being referenced in the 2025 descriptions [1] [2].
4. How dated analyses and source language create reporting variance
Some of the source fragments provided lack dates or include older explanatory pieces, and the variances in phrasing — for example, counting six non-voting members versus presenting a total of seven limited-vote representatives — appear tied to whether an author treats the Resident Commissioner as a member of the “non-voting delegates” category or as a separate office with similar privileges; this interpretive choice, not an actual change in membership, explains conflicting headline counts across the provided material [7] [3]. The analysis excerpts also show that fact-check and encyclopedic entries sometimes compress terminology for brevity, producing statements like “six non-voting members” while other entries outline the seven offices explicitly, so readers should infer that the underlying roster of jurisdictions is stable even when the headline number shifts [4] [5].
5. Bottom line and recommended citation when precision matters
When precision is required, state the fact as: “In 2025 there are six territorial and district non-voting delegates plus one Resident Commissioner representing Puerto Rico, for a total of seven members with limited voting power in the House” and then list the jurisdictions by name; this formulation captures both the common nomenclature and the functional reality and aligns with the combined representations described across the provided analyses [1] [2] [3]. If a reader or publication prefers a single number, clarify whether Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner is included in that tally to avoid the common ambiguity evident in the source set.