Which nonprofits have publicly documented ties to antifa-affiliated groups?

Checked on December 1, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Reporting and investigations since 2025 show heated claims but limited public documentation tying U.S. nonprofits directly to “antifa”-affiliated groups. Some outlets and political actors allege funding links to coalitions like Stop Cop City/Defend the Atlanta Forest and implicate large funders such as Open Society Foundations; other major outlets and experts say the connections are thin, inconsistent, or mischaracterized [1] [2] [3].

1. What advocates and critics are claiming — a contested money trail

Advocates in the Trump administration and allied researchers assert there is a nonprofit-to-Antifa funding pipeline: reports and briefings allege funding has reached groups such as the Stop Cop City and Defend the Atlanta Forest coalition and point to philanthropy networks as indirect enablers [1] [4]. These claims have fueled executive actions — including an order to target “Antifa” and directives to IRS and law enforcement to investigate tax‑exempt groups for material support — elevating the question of which nonprofits, if any, have “publicly documented ties” [5].

2. What independent reporting and experts say — many links are disputed

Major news outlets and civil‑society experts warn that the administration’s designations and assertions do not map neatly onto on‑the‑ground realities: The New York Times reported that the foreign groups the State Department labeled “Antifa” have no local ties to anything known as “antifa,” and experts characterize many of the named groups as “barely exist[ing]” or mischaracterized [2] [6]. Civil‑liberties groups such as the Brennan Center argue the administration’s directives rely on “unsupported allegations” and could sweep in legitimate nonprofits without clear evidence [5].

3. Specific organizations named in public accusations

Some investigative pieces and conservative outlets explicitly name networks and funders. One long-form investigation and allied reporting connect donations and grant flows to local coalitions like Defend the Atlanta Forest/Stop Cop City and attribute those coalitions’ activism to “Antifa-associated extremism” in their framing [1]. Other reporting and commentators point to entities such as the Open Society Foundations as part of a broader philanthropy network funding progressive causes, while disputing direct payments “to Antifa rioters” [1] [3].

4. Limits of the public record — what’s documented versus asserted

Available sources show assertions and investigations but do not produce a clear, universally accepted list of U.S. nonprofits with incontrovertible, publicly documented operational ties to Antifa. Reporting highlights patterns of grants to protest-support organizations, bail funds, and local coalitions, but independent journalists and experts say naming a nonprofit as an Antifa affiliate often rests on inference, association, or political framing rather than direct, publicly disclosed operational control or command [1] [6] [3].

5. Legal and policy consequences driving the debate

Policy moves — notably executive orders and NSPM‑7 — instruct the IRS and law enforcement to look for “material support” from tax‑exempt entities, raising the stakes for nonprofits even when evidence is circumstantial [5]. Civil‑liberty advocates warn those probes could punish organizations for routine grantmaking or legal protest‑support services absent clear evidence of criminal collaboration [5].

6. Competing narratives and possible agendas

The sources reveal competing motives: administration and allied research groups frame a narrative of a coordinated leftist funding network to justify enforcement actions [4] [3]. Conversely, investigative reporters and rights organizations emphasize mislabeling and political targeting, suggesting the administration’s list is selective and influenced by partisan goals [6] [5]. Advocacy outlets may amplify tenuous links while critics urge caution about guilt by association [1] [3].

7. What the public record does and does not show — a cautious takeaway

Available reporting documents allegations and some grant flows tied to protest coalitions (for example, reporting that links donations to Stop Cop City/Defend the Atlanta Forest in certain investigations), but the evidence does not amount to a single, uncontested public roster of U.S. nonprofits that have operationally documented, direct ties to Antifa as an organization [1] [2]. Sources differ sharply on definitions: “Antifa” is a loose movement rather than a centralized group, and several outlets note that foreign designations and U.S. claims do not align with local realities [6] [2].

8. How to follow this story responsibly

Track primary documents (IRS findings, State Department fact sheets, court filings) and in‑depth reporting from multiple outlets; treat claims of “ties” as three distinct categories — financial grants to protest‑related coalitions, ideological affinity, and operational control — and demand documentation for each before accepting that a nonprofit “has ties” to Antifa [5] [3]. Current public sources document assertions and some funding pathways but stop short of producing a definitive, universally corroborated list of nonprofits with direct, operational Antifa affiliations [1] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Which nonprofits have been accused of funding antifa-affiliated groups and what evidence supports those claims?
How do watchdogs and government agencies define and identify antifa-affiliated organizations?
Have any nonprofits lost tax-exempt status or funding due to links with antifa-affiliated groups?
What legal standards govern labeling a nonprofit as connected to extremist movements like antifa?
How can donors vet nonprofits for potential ties to politically violent or extremist groups?