Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Second Whistleblower: Receipts Attached. The NSA Audited the 2024 Election. Kamala Won.
1. Summary of the results
The analyses reveal no credible evidence supporting the claim that the NSA audited the 2024 election or that Kamala Harris won. Multiple sources directly contradict this assertion:
- Kamala Harris conceded the election to Donald Trump [1], with sources explicitly stating that "Kamala Harris lost the election to Donald Trump" [2]
- While one source mentions "allegations of NSA-authorized forensic audit of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election," it does not provide conclusive evidence to support either the NSA audit claim or that Kamala won [3]
- Several sources were inaccessible due to temporary blocks, preventing verification [4]
- One source discusses the general importance of post-election audits but makes no mention of the 2024 election, NSA audit, or Kamala winning [5]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement omits several critical facts:
- Donald Trump was declared the winner of the 2024 presidential election, with Kamala Harris publicly conceding defeat [1] [2]
- There were legitimate concerns about voting machine errors in specific locations like New York's Rockland County, but these were isolated incidents rather than evidence of widespread fraud [6]
- The Election Truth Alliance has made statements about alleged NSA audits, but these remain unsubstantiated allegations rather than verified facts [3]
- Post-election audits are standard practice for ensuring electoral integrity, but there's no evidence of a specific NSA-conducted audit that changed the election outcome [5]
Organizations and individuals promoting election integrity measures would benefit from society accepting claims of hidden audits, as this could justify calls for more extensive election oversight and potentially undermine confidence in established results.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement contains several red flags indicating potential misinformation:
- Contradicts established historical facts: Multiple credible sources confirm that Kamala Harris lost and conceded the election to Donald Trump [2] [1]
- Makes extraordinary claims without evidence: No source provides concrete proof of an NSA audit or evidence that Kamala Harris actually won the election [3]
- Uses sensationalized language: Terms like "Second Whistleblower" and "Receipts Attached" are designed to create urgency and credibility without providing actual substantiation
- Conflates allegations with facts: While some sources mention allegations of NSA involvement, these remain unproven claims rather than verified information [3]
The statement appears to be spreading false information about the 2024 election results, potentially to undermine confidence in the legitimate electoral outcome or to promote conspiracy theories about hidden government audits.