What is the number of women that have gotten money out of suing trump for assult

1. The single, widely reported payout: E. Jean Carroll’s awards

E. Jean Carroll brought litigation against Donald Trump for defamation and later for battery under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, and the two related cases resulted in a total damages award reported as $88.3 million in the sources provided ^[1]. Reporting also notes that juries found Trump civilly liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll in those proceedings, while other criminal determinations (including a rape finding) were not made in the civil verdict as described in coverage ^{[1] [5]}.

2. The much larger group of accusers — but not awardees

News summaries and aggregations say at least about two dozen or “more than two dozen” women have publicly accused Trump of groping, sexual harassment, or assault going back decades, but those counts are descriptions of allegations and public accusations, not confirmations of civil money recoveries ^{[2] [3] [5]}. The presence of many public allegations has been central to the public narrative, yet the sources distinguish between accusation counts and actual court-ordered or publicly reported monetary awards ^{[2] [3]}.

3. Settlements, dropped suits and opaque resolutions

Some complaints or lawsuits mentioned in reporting were dropped or resolved in ways the sources describe as settlements or withdrawals, but the material supplied does not provide clear, attributable dollar-amount payments to specific women for sexual-assault claims beyond Carroll; for example, one account says a plaintiff “dropped the suit a few weeks after filing it” as part of a settlement tied to a separate claim, without detailing an assault-specific payout ^[4]. That means some disputes may have been quietly resolved, but the available reporting does not document other explicit monetary awards to named women for assault suits against Trump ^[4].

4. Legal and social forces that enabled the Carroll award — and limited other recoveries

Carroll’s success is tied in reporting to several converging factors: the #MeToo movement’s cultural shift, New York’s Adult Survivors Act that temporarily revived certain claims beyond prior statutes of limitation, and persistent litigation over Trump’s public denials and disparagement that gave rise to defamation counts and additional damages ^{[5] [1]}. Those specific legal and temporal circumstances help explain why Carroll’s case produced a large, public award while many other accusations did not translate into comparable civil money judgments in the record provided ^{[5] [1]}.

5. Political context, media narratives and incentives

Coverage repeatedly emphasizes both the number of public accusations (“about two dozen” or “at least 25”) and the political stakes of high-profile litigation, with defenders framing allegations as partisan attacks and critics framing settlements or judgments as accountability moments; these contested narratives shape what gets litigated publicly and what is kept private or settled, and the sources themselves reflect that tug-of-war in how they highlight allegations versus confirmed awards ^{[2] [3] [5]}. Reporting also notes that some plaintiffs withdrew claims amid concerns about safety or as part of broader legal deals, which can obscure the monetary trail ^[4].

6. Conclusion and reporting limits

Based on the supplied reporting, the clearest, documented instance of a woman receiving money tied to suing Trump for sexual-assault-related claims is E. Jean Carroll, with the two cases producing a combined award reported as $88.3 million; the sources do not document other named women receiving court-ordered monetary awards for assault in the public record provided here, though some suits were dropped or settled under terms not fully disclosed in these sources ^{[1] [4] [2]}. If additional documented payouts exist, they are not described in the materials supplied for this analysis, and further primary-source legal records or contemporary reporting would be required to identify them.