Were there documented contacts between Obama administration officials and the Muslim Brotherhood 2009–2016?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Documented contacts between Obama administration officials and individuals or members linked to the Muslim Brotherhood occurred at multiple points between 2009–2016, described in academic, policy and journalistic sources as “engagement” or “diplomatic outreach” rather than covert alliance; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly said in June 2011 the U.S. would “welcome…dialogue” with peaceful Muslim Brotherhood members [1]. Sources show White House invitations to U.S. Muslim groups with Brotherhood links for Obama’s 2009 Cairo speech and recorded meetings between White House Office of Public Engagement staff and Muslim-American leaders tied by some organizations to Brotherhood networks [2] [3] [4].
1. Documented meetings and formal outreach: routine diplomacy, not secret pact
Contemporary reporting and policy analysis describe Obama-era officials conducting “encouraging…conversations” and routine diplomatic engagement with opposition leaders that included Muslim Brotherhood figures as part of post‑2011 Arab Spring outreach; Secretary Clinton framed the position publicly in June 2011, saying the U.S. would engage parties that are peaceful and committed to nonviolence [1]. Academic reviews of U.S. policy toward Egypt note resumed diplomatic contact and recognition of Brotherhood figures as part of that engagement [5] [2].
2. White House contacts with U.S. Muslim organizations with alleged Brotherhood links
Records and investigative accounts show White House visits and meetings with American Muslim organizations that critics allege have ties to Brotherhood networks. Examples cited include invitations to groups such as the Islamic Society of North America and meetings logged between White House staff and activists like Mohamed Ayloush of the Council on American‑Islamic Relations, as reported by watchdog outlets and cited in investigations [2] [3]. These contacts were characterized by critics as a “red carpet,” while administration statements framed them as outreach to American Muslim communities [3] [2].
3. High-level diplomatic encounters: Morsi and the UNGA meeting
Reporting notes that President Obama met Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, a Muslim Brotherhood member, at the United Nations General Assembly in 2012 — an encounter described as part of routine diplomatic relations between the U.S. president and a then‑head of state [6] [7]. Sources emphasize that other U.S. politicians also met Brotherhood figures during that period, and administration defenders called such meetings standard diplomacy [7].
4. Interpretation disputes: engagement vs. favoritism
Analysts and critics sharply disagree about the meaning of engagement. Proponents in policy fora argued the U.S. needed to deal with newly empowered political actors to protect U.S. interests and encourage moderation [1]. Opponents, including writers and think tanks sympathetic to Egyptian government narratives, accused the Obama administration of facilitating the Brotherhood’s ascent and favoring it across Egypt, Libya and Syria — claims advanced in books and op-eds but drawn from differing interpretations of policy decisions [8] [9] [10].
5. Source limitations and contested evidence
Available sources document meetings, statements and outreach but differ on scope and intent. Academic and policy pieces record engagement and a shift in tone toward dealing with Islamist parties [5] [1]. Investigative outlets and opinion pieces link specific U.S. contacts to organizations alleged to be Brotherhood fronts and portray the contacts as extensive [3] [2]. Other sources and the administration described contacts as routine diplomatic outreach; public records cited in reporting support both factual meetings and competing interpretations [7] [1]. Available sources do not mention secret agreements or covert operational support beyond diplomatic engagement claims (not found in current reporting).
6. Why this matters: diplomacy, perception and downstream politics
The Obama administration’s choice to engage Brotherhood-linked actors during a volatile regional transition shaped narratives in Egypt and the Gulf and became a political issue domestically and abroad. Congressional and think‑tank debates later contrasted Obama-era policy with subsequent administrations’ approaches, treating engagement as either pragmatic diplomacy or a policy error that required reversal [11] [1]. Critics in Egypt and allied governments used U.S. contacts to allege undue influence; supporters argued engagement created channels to press for nonviolence and inclusion [8] [1].
In short: multiple, documented contacts and public statements confirm the Obama administration engaged with Muslim Brotherhood members and affiliated organizations between 2009–2016 [2] [5] [1]. Sources diverge sharply on whether those contacts were prudent diplomacy or improper favoritism; the public record cited above documents meetings and policy statements but does not, in the provided material, establish clandestine conspiracies or definitive operational support beyond diplomatic outreach [3] [7].