Did Obama's use of drone strikes increase or decrease during his presidency?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that Obama's use of drone strikes increased during his presidency [1]. According to the sources, there were ten times more air strikes in the covert war on terror during President Barack Obama’s presidency than under his predecessor, George W. Bush [1], with a total of 563 strikes, largely by drones, targeted Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen during Obama's two terms, compared to 57 strikes under Bush [1]. Additionally, 1,878 drone strikes were carried out during Mr Obama's eight years in office [2]. However, it is essential to note that the sources do not provide a direct comparison of the increase or decrease in drone strikes during Obama's presidency, but rather compare his numbers to those of his predecessors and successors [1] [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some key context missing from the original statement includes:
- The number of drone strikes conducted during specific years of Obama's presidency, which could help determine if the use of drone strikes increased or decreased over time [1].
- Alternative viewpoints on the use of drone strikes, such as the perspectives of other countries or international organizations, which could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue [3] [4].
- The motivations behind Obama's use of drone strikes, which could help explain why the number of strikes increased during his presidency [1].
- Comparisons to other military tactics, which could provide context on the relative frequency of drone strikes compared to other forms of military action [2].
The sources also highlight that Trump launched 238 drone strikes in Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan during his first two years, compared to Obama’s 186 in his first two years [5], which could be seen as an alternative viewpoint on the use of drone strikes.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading as it implies a straightforward increase or decrease in drone strikes during Obama's presidency, when in fact the sources suggest a more complex situation [1]. The statement may also be biased towards presenting Obama's use of drone strikes in a negative light, as it does not provide context on the motivations behind the strikes or comparisons to other military tactics [3] [4]. Additionally, the sources may be influenced by political agendas, with some sources potentially downplaying or exaggerating the number of drone strikes to suit their narrative [5] [2]. The ACLU and other organizations may benefit from a critical portrayal of Obama's drone strike policy, while the Obama administration and its supporters may benefit from a more nuanced understanding of the context surrounding the use of drone strikes [3] [4].