Which countries were most targeted by Obama's drone strikes?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen were the countries most targeted by Obama's drone strikes during his presidency ^[1]. The data shows that Obama authorized a total of 542-563 drone strikes across these three nations during his two terms in office ^{[1] [2]}.

The human cost of these operations was significant, with estimates indicating between 384 and 807 civilian casualties resulted from these strikes ^[1]. More comprehensive casualty figures suggest that Obama's drone program resulted in an estimated 3,797 total deaths, including 324 civilians ^[2]. According to various monitoring organizations, civilians comprised between 7.27% to 15.47% of all deaths from US drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia during the 2009-2016 period ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several crucial pieces of context that emerge from the analyses:

• Transparency and accountability issues: The Obama administration faced criticism for disparate responses to civilian casualties, particularly regarding the difference in how Western versus non-Western civilian deaths were handled ^[4]. This suggests that human rights organizations and advocacy groups would benefit from greater transparency in drone operations.
• Policy evolution and normalization: Obama's presidency saw the expansion and normalization of the drone program ^[2], indicating that this was not merely a continuation of previous policies but an active escalation.
• Subsequent policy changes: The Trump administration later revoked Obama's requirement for US intelligence officials to publish civilian casualty numbers from drone strikes outside war zones ^[5], suggesting that military and intelligence agencies may benefit from reduced oversight and public scrutiny.
• Geographic scope: While the question focuses on the "most targeted" countries, the analyses indicate that drone operations also occurred in Afghanistan and other locations ^[5], providing a broader context for the program's global reach.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain misinformation, as it is a straightforward factual inquiry. However, the framing could potentially lead to incomplete understanding by:

• Focusing solely on targeting frequency rather than the broader implications of civilian casualties and legal accountability
• Omitting the institutional benefits that various stakeholders derive from either promoting or obscuring information about drone operations
• Not acknowledging the ongoing debate about transparency requirements that has continued beyond Obama's presidency, with subsequent administrations modifying reporting requirements ^[5]

The question's neutral phrasing avoids obvious bias, but a more comprehensive inquiry might address the policy implications and human rights concerns that multiple sources highlight as central to understanding the full scope of Obama's drone program.