Fact check: Obama russia election

1. Summary of the results

The original statement "obama russia election" appears to refer to claims that the Obama administration was involved in manufacturing intelligence on Russia's interference in the 2016 US presidential election. According to ^[1], Trump's spy chief, Tulsi Gabbard, claims that the Obama administration 'manufactured' intel on Russia, but this claim is based on a report that doesn't directly contradict the central thesis of the 2017 assessment that Russia attempted to influence the American public and their perceptions of the 2016 election ^[1]. ^[2] presents a one-sided view, stating that new evidence uncovers an Obama-directed creation of false intelligence used to launch a years-long coup against President Trump, but it lacks concrete evidence to support these claims ^[2]. In contrast, ^[3] reports that experts say the declassified documents do not appear to implicate Obama in any apparent way, and several investigations have previously found that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election ^[3].

Other analyses, such as ^[4], discuss the US-Russia relationship during the Obama administration, including the reset policy and its impact on the 2012 presidential election, without providing direct evidence of Obama's involvement in Russian election interference ^[4]. ^[5] claims that the Obama administration knew Russia did not affect the 2016 election outcome through cyberattacks, citing a 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment, but this assessment was later contradicted by another report ^[5]. ^[6] reports that former President Obama stands by the US intelligence community's conclusion that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election, despite a report claiming that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for a coup against Trump ^[6].

Additionally, ^[1] and ^[2] reiterate the claims made by Trump's spy chief, Tulsi Gabbard, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, respectively, regarding the Obama administration's alleged manufacture of intel on Russia ^{[1] [2]}. ^[7] reports on Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's efforts to sow doubt about the investigation that found Russia interfered in the 2016 election ^[7].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key points that are missing from the original statement include:

• The context of the US-Russia relationship during the Obama administration, including the reset policy and its impact on the 2012 presidential election ^[4].
• The findings of several investigations that have previously concluded that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election ^[3].
• The lack of concrete evidence to support claims that the Obama administration manufactured intel on Russia ^[2].
• The contradictions between different reports and assessments regarding Russia's interference in the 2016 election ^[5].
• The alternative viewpoints of experts who say that the declassified documents do not appear to implicate Obama in any apparent way ^[3].
• The motivations behind the claims made by Trump's spy chief, Tulsi Gabbard, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement "obama russia election" may be misleading or biased because it:

• Lacks context and does not provide a clear understanding of the complex issues surrounding the US-Russia relationship and the 2016 presidential election ^[4].
• Implies wrongdoing by the Obama administration without providing concrete evidence to support these claims ^[2].
• Ignores contradictory evidence and alternative viewpoints that suggest Russia did interfere in the 2016 election ^{[3] [5]}.
• May be motivated by political agendas or biases, as evidenced by the claims made by Trump's spy chief, Tulsi Gabbard, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ^{[1] [2]}.

The parties that may benefit from this framing include:

• Trump and his allies, who may use these claims to discredit the Obama administration and undermine the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election ^{[1] [2]}.
• Those who seek to sow doubt about the investigation and its findings, such as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard ^[7].
• Those who have a vested interest in promoting a narrative that the Obama administration was involved in manufacturing intel on Russia, such as the Office of