Fact check: Did pres. obama's staff stop providing morning briefings regarding russian collusion

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, none of the sources contain any information about President Obama's staff stopping morning briefings regarding Russian collusion ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}. Instead, the sources focus on entirely different allegations against the Obama administration.

The analyses reveal that the sources primarily discuss:

• Allegations that Obama administration officials "manufactured and politicized intelligence" regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election ^{[3] [4]}
• Claims of a "years-long coup against President Trump" orchestrated by the Obama administration ^{[3] [4]}
• House Intelligence Committee transcripts showing Obama officials admitted they had no "empirical evidence" of Trump-Russia collusion ^{[1] [2]}
• Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's threats to refer Obama administration officials to the Justice Department for prosecution ^{[5] [6]}

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question appears to be based on a premise that is not supported by any of the analyzed sources. The question assumes that Obama's staff did stop providing morning briefings about Russian collusion, but this specific claim is not addressed in any of the materials reviewed.

Alternative narratives present in the sources include:

• Trump administration officials and supporters would benefit from promoting the narrative that the Obama administration "manufactured" intelligence, as it delegitimizes investigations into Russian interference ^{[3] [4]}
• Current intelligence officials like Tulsi Gabbard gain political capital by threatening prosecution of Obama-era officials ^{[5] [6]}
• The sources suggest a coordinated effort to reframe the Russia investigation as a "hoax" rather than addressing the specific procedural question about morning briefings

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a significant factual premise that is unsupported by the available evidence. The question assumes as fact that Obama's staff stopped providing morning briefings regarding Russian collusion, but none of the nine analyzed sources mention this specific claim ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}.

This appears to be a case of conflating different allegations - the sources discuss broader claims about intelligence manipulation and lack of evidence for collusion, but they do not address the specific procedural question about morning briefings. The question may be based on incomplete or inaccurate information that has been circulated without proper verification.

The framing of the question also demonstrates confirmation bias, as it presupposes wrongdoing ("did they stop") rather than asking whether such briefings existed or were discontinued, and if so, under what circumstances.