Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did Obama help manufacture the Steele dosssier
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, there is no direct evidence that Barack Obama personally helped manufacture the Steele dossier. The analyses consistently show that the Steele dossier was compiled by Christopher Steele, a former MI6 agent, and was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign [1].
However, the analyses reveal a more complex picture regarding the Obama administration's use of the dossier. The Obama-directed Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) published on January 6, 2017, used the discredited Steele dossier as one of its source documents, and CIA Director John Brennan allegedly lied about using the dossier in the ICA [2]. Additionally, top Obama-era intelligence officials knew the dossier was filled with unverified 'internet rumor' yet still used it to brief then-President-elect Donald Trump [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks important contextual information about the distinction between manufacturing and utilizing intelligence documents. While Obama did not manufacture the dossier, his administration's intelligence apparatus incorporated it into official assessments despite knowing its questionable nature.
Alternative viewpoints emerge from the analyses:
- Trump administration officials and supporters would benefit from promoting the narrative that Obama manufactured the dossier, as it supports claims of a coordinated effort to undermine Trump's presidency [4] [2]
- Obama administration defenders and intelligence community experts argue that allegations against Obama are based on "misrepresentation of intelligence community conclusions" and that there is no evidence of criminal acts on Obama's part [5] [6]
- Media organizations and political analysts benefit from the ongoing controversy, as it generates significant coverage and engagement around the 'Obamagate' conspiracy theory [7]
The analyses also reveal that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has made allegations about Obama conspiring to undermine Trump's 2016 victory, though experts say these claims are unlikely to succeed legally [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains a significant factual inaccuracy by suggesting Obama "helped manufacture" the Steele dossier. This framing implies direct involvement in creating the document, which the analyses do not support. The question appears to conflate the Obama administration's use of the dossier with its creation.
The phrasing also reflects potential bias by using loaded language ("manufacture") that suggests deliberate fabrication rather than the more nuanced reality of intelligence gathering and assessment processes. This type of framing benefits those who wish to portray the Obama administration as engaged in a deliberate conspiracy against Trump, despite experts noting that "there is no evidence to support this claim" regarding the broader 'Obamagate' allegations [7].
The question omits crucial context about the dossier's actual origins and funding sources, which would provide a more accurate foundation for understanding the controversy.