Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did Obama make tunnels?
Executive Summary
President Barack Obama did not personally "make tunnels"; the available records show he approved or supported infrastructure funding and policies that could contribute to tunnel projects, but there is no credible evidence he built or directly constructed tunnels himself. Contemporary reporting and fact checks link Obama to funding initiatives, infrastructure bills, and proposals like the Gateway tunnel funding, while also documenting conspiracy rumors that falsely claim he created secret tunnels [1] [2] [3]. The claim that “Obama made tunnels” conflates federal funding, policy advocacy, and rumor-based conspiracy narratives without factual support [4] [5].
1. How the Claim Appeared and Why It’s Misleading
The assertion that Obama “made tunnels” appears rooted in a conflation of government infrastructure funding and sensational conspiracy theories. Reporting from 2011 noted Obama was expected to approve $15 million toward a Gateway Tunnel planning effort, demonstrating executive involvement in funding discussions rather than physical construction [1]. Subsequent coverage of the Gateway project through 2025 discusses political impacts on the multibillion-dollar tunnel effort between New Jersey and Manhattan but attributes delays to policy and politics rather than to any president physically making tunnels [4]. Separately, widely debunked conspiracy rumors from 2015 and later tied unrelated tunnel claims to prominent figures, which do not provide evidence connecting Obama to constructing secret underground networks [3] [5].
2. What the Record Shows: Funding, Policy, and Signed Bills
The factual record demonstrates presidential roles in infrastructure priority-setting, funding proposals, and legislation—not personal construction of infrastructure. Obama announced multi-billion-dollar infrastructure and building efficiency initiatives and backed federal transportation spending, including a five-year, $305 billion transportation bill signed in 2015 that addressed aging systems without indicating he built tunnels [6] [2]. His administration promoted a “fix-it-first” approach and measures to attract private investment and streamline approvals, signaling policy influence on projects that may include tunnels, but these are administrative actions rather than direct physical construction by the president [7].
3. The Gateway Tunnel Example: Policy Support, Not Personal Creation
The Gateway Tunnel has been cited in coverage as an example linking presidential decisions to tunnel projects, but the evidence shows presidential involvement in funding decisions, not authorship of construction. A 2011 report indicated an expectation that Obama would approve $15 million for Gateway planning, and 2025 reporting describes the project as ongoing and politically vulnerable; neither source states Obama built the tunnel or engineered it personally [1] [4]. The project’s delays and politics are documented, underscoring the distinction between federal support and the long, multi-actor process of actual tunnel construction, which involves state agencies, transit authorities, contractors, and local governments [4].
4. Conspiracy Theories and Their Rejection by Reporting
Multiple articles have cataloged and debunked conspiracy claims about secret tunnels, showing these narratives are driven by rumor rather than documentary evidence. Coverage from 2015 and later recounts claims about underground tunnels beneath retail sites and other venues, with Walmart and military authorities denying such rumors and providing no proof linking Obama to clandestine tunnel networks [3] [5]. A more recent 2025 example highlights unrelated speculation about an underground tunnel behind a stage advanced by a public commentator, illustrating how modern conspiratorial thinking recycles tunnel tropes without factual grounding or connection to presidential action [8].
5. Divergent Views: Funding Advocates vs. Political Opponents
Sources illustrate two different framings: advocates emphasize administrative funding and reforms to address infrastructure needs, while opponents or conspiracy-minded commentators sometimes use tunnel narratives for political effect. Obama-era announcements framed investments—such as green building upgrades and infrastructure proposals—as governmental responsibilities to improve transportation and energy efficiency [6] [7]. Conversely, critics and fringe voices have advanced claims of secret tunnels or misattributed direct construction, which mainstream reporting has consistently treated as unsubstantiated and sometimes debunked [5] [3].
6. Bottom Line: What Readers Should Take Away
The available documentation confirms Obama’s role as a policy-maker and funder on infrastructure matters but does not support the claim that he personally made tunnels. References to Gateway funding and signed infrastructure legislation show administrative influence over project priorities and financing, while multiple fact-checking reports and denials address circulating tunnel conspiracies and find them unsupported [1] [2] [3]. Consumers of such claims should distinguish between governmental funding or advocacy for infrastructure projects and the unfounded suggestion that a president physically constructed secret tunnels.