How much did the Obama White House basketball court cost in total and what line items made up that cost?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple fact-checks and contemporaneous reporting show the Obama White House did not spend anywhere near the viral figures of $300–$376 million to create a basketball court; the South Lawn court was a 2009 adaptation of an existing tennis court that added hoops and painted lines and “did not require extensive construction” [1] [2]. Reporting says the work was small, likely privately funded or paid by the Obamas, and that no official line‑item costs or government budget entries for a multimillion‑dollar project are found in available sources [3] [4].
1. What the record says: a modest conversion, not a multimillion-dollar build
The Obama White House archive describes the installation as adapting an existing tennis court so it “could be used for both tennis and basketball,” noting a smaller outdoor court already existed on the grounds [2]. Multiple independent fact-checks and news outlets characterize the change as adding hoops and court markings—not a ground‑up construction project—contradicting social posts that reported hundreds of millions spent [1] [5].
2. The viral claim and how it spread
In 2025 social-media posts and partisan commentary recycled claims that Obama “spent $375–$376 million” on a White House basketball court as a rhetorical counter to a Trump‑era ballroom project. Fact‑checkers traced the allegation to misrepresentation of the 2009 adaptation; outlets rebutted the large dollar figures as unfounded [6] [1] [5].
3. Funding: private, presidential, or unitemized — the sources disagree or are silent
Market Realist and other reports say the Obamas avoided using taxpayer funds or accepting donation money for White House decorating and that the White House declined to disclose a budget for the court renovation, implying the project was paid privately or at least not through an identified federal appropriations line [3]. Several fact checks conclude the work was “likely privately funded,” but available sources do not provide an official invoice or accounting of who paid line by line [5] [4].
4. Line items: not documented in public records
No source in the reporting surfaces an itemized budget or procurement record listing line items—materials, labor, resurfacing, hoops, paint, or permits—for the 2009 adaptation. Fact-check articles explicitly state there is “no official cost” released and no records showing a budget earmarked for a large project in 2009 [1] [4]. The White House archive gives scope but not costs [2]. Therefore, an asserted detailed cost breakdown is not supported by available reporting.
5. Plausible scale and third‑party estimates
Pricing analyses published after the viral claims estimate a conversion of lines and removable hoops onto an existing court would plausibly be a low five‑figure job—roughly several thousand to perhaps around $10,000 if resurfacing were included—based on current market rates, not hundreds of millions; those are estimates by private analysts, not official bills [7]. The key point in reporting is the scale: modest, not monumental [7] [1].
6. Why the misinformation matters: political framing and context
The $300–$376 million figures circulated in 2025 as part of partisan comparisons between Obama’s court and Trump’s planned ballroom. Outlets and fact checks note this framing serves to normalize or deflect criticism of large White House projects by invoking an exaggerated past example; that suggests a political motive behind propagation of false numbers [6] [1].
7. Where the record is limited and what we don’t know
Public sources do not publish an itemized invoice, a White House procurement entry, or a federal appropriation line showing the precise dollars spent on the 2009 adaptation; reporting instead relies on the White House’s description of scope and statements that costs were not disclosed [2] [3] [4]. Available sources do not mention a definitive line‑by‑line accounting of materials, labor, or contractor fees related to the adaptation.
8. Bottom line for readers
Claims that Obama spent $300–$376 million of taxpayer money to build a White House basketball court are contradicted by White House descriptions and multiple fact checks; the project was an adaptation of an existing tennis court, small in scale, with no public record supporting those large dollar amounts, and reporting indicates the cost was either modest or privately handled rather than a documented federal expenditure [1] [2] [4].