What official DHS or CBP staffing reports list total active Border Patrol agents and ICE enforcement personnel by date in 2026?

Checked on January 25, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Official, dated headcounts for Border Patrol agents in 2026 and ICE enforcement personnel are found in CBP and DHS publications — chiefly the CBP FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification and CBP’s enforcement statistics dashboards — but a clear, single ICE “by‑date” public staffing table for 2026 is not contained in the sources provided; public watchdog and agency materials fill some gaps and raise questions about how those totals are reported and interpreted [1] [2] [3].

1. CBP’s FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification is the primary official source listing CBP positions for 2026

The Department of Homeland Security’s FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification for CBP explicitly lists agency-wide position and FTE counts for FY2026 — the document shows CBP’s FY2026 budget framing includes 69,874 positions and 67,964 full‑time equivalents, and it itemizes funding and hiring initiatives such as money to hire an additional 450 CBP officers [1].

2. CBP’s online enforcement statistics and dashboards provide dated operational and some staffing figures through FY2026

CBP’s Enforcement Statistics pages and related dashboards report operational metrics across fiscal years and expressly cover FY2017–FY2026, and the site is the public place where CBP posts its FY‑to‑date enforcement and related staffing snapshots [2]. These dashboards are the go‑to official source for researchers seeking time‑series data that align enforcement activity with the fiscal year calendar [2].

3. GAO and other official reviews supply historical staffing series but may lag into 2024 for detailed component breakdowns

Government Accountability Office reporting on CBP recruitment and staffing includes accessible data tables showing net staffing gains, losses, and overall staffing levels for Border Patrol agent positions through the second quarter of FY2024; GAO’s dataset and figures are authoritative for historical staffing trends but do not, in the provided material, extend to a granular quarter‑by‑quarter 2026 time series [4].

4. ICE official pages and DHS statements offer partial counts but lack a consolidated, dated 2026 enforcement‑personnel table in the provided material

ICE’s careers and component pages publish program and component employee counts — for example Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) is described as having more than 10,400 employees, including roughly 7,100 special agents and 800 criminal analysts — but the ICE materials in the dataset do not present a single, dated public table that tracks “total ICE enforcement personnel” by month or quarter in 2026 the way CBP’s FY26 budget and dashboards do for CBP components [5]. DHS statements and reporting cited elsewhere claim very large recent hiring efforts (for example DHS/ICE reporting of many thousands of hires and public reporting of a 12,000‑hire increase), but those are programmatic claims rather than a standardized, dated staffing series document [6] [7].

5. Watchdogs and analysts show both gaps and skepticism about how DHS/CBP/ICE report staffing, and that matters for interpreting 2026 figures

The DHS Office of Inspector General and independent groups have flagged that CBP and ICE historically lacked operational staffing plans and that published hiring goals do not always equal net increases — the OIG and American Immigration Council reporting emphasize that hiring targets, attrition, and deployment plans affect whether headline numbers reflect active on‑the‑ground agents, and they specifically questioned needs for proposed increases and the agencies’ ability to produce accurate deployment‑by‑date data [3] [8]. These critiques underscore that even when DHS or CBP publish totals [1] [2], analysts must treat them as budgeted positions or snapshots rather than an incontrovertible, daily census of “active” agents without consulting the underlying methodology.

6. Bottom line: where to find official 2026 totals and what is missing

For official, dated totals in 2026 for CBP components, consult the CBP FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification and CBP’s Enforcement Statistics dashboards [1] [2]; for Border Patrol‑specific time series, GAO historical staffing tables are authoritative up to mid‑2024 and useful for trend context [4]. For ICE, no single official “by‑date 2026” enforcement‑personnel table appears in the provided sources — ICE component summaries (HSI counts) and DHS/agency hiring announcements provide partial figures but do not substitute for a consolidated ICE staffing series covering 2026 in the materials supplied [5] [6]. Where precision matters, researchers should pair CBP’s FY26 budget/dashboards with GAO and DHS OIG materials and seek direct DHS/ICE personnel tables or congressional testimony for dated ICE enforcement totals, because the public documents reviewed here leave that specific 2026 by‑date table absent or incomplete [4] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Where can congressional testimony or DHS staffing tables be obtained that list ICE enforcement personnel by quarter in 2026?
How do DHS and GAO methodologies differ when reporting Border Patrol agent counts and FTEs?
What did the DHS Office of Inspector General recommend in 2025 about tracking and validating CBP and ICE staffing levels?