Fact check: Does the one big beautiful bill actually limit overtime to 5 hours.

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided from various sources, including CNN Politics ^[1], Jackson Walker ^[2], and the Internal Revenue Service ^{[3] [4]}, indicate that there is no mention of limiting overtime to 5 hours in the discussions about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025. The sources primarily focus on the tax implications of overtime pay, new deductions for qualified overtime compensation, and other provisions related to tax deductions and benefits ^{[1] [5] [2] [3] [6] [4]}. No source confirms the 5-hour overtime limit, suggesting that this claim may not be accurate ^{[1] [5] [2] [3] [7] [6] [4] [8]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the actual text of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which could provide clarity on whether such a provision exists ^{[7] [8]}. Alternative viewpoints, such as those from labor unions or worker advocacy groups, could offer insights into how overtime regulations might impact workers and employers ^{[1] [2]}. Additionally, historical context on overtime regulations could help understand whether a 5-hour limit is a new or proposed standard ^[6]. The sources provided, including the Internal Revenue Service ^{[3] [4]} and Jackson Walker ^[2], primarily discuss tax implications, suggesting that a broader range of viewpoints is necessary for a comprehensive understanding ^{[1] [5] [2] [3] [6] [4] [8]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement's claim about a 5-hour overtime limit appears to be unsubstantiated by the provided analyses ^{[1] [5] [2] [3] [7] [6] [4] [8]}. This could indicate misinformation or a lack of understanding of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's provisions ^[1]. The sources, including CNN Politics ^[1] and the Internal Revenue Service ^{[3] [4]}, do not support the claim, suggesting that it may be intentionally or unintentionally misleading ^{[1] [5] [2] [3] [6] [4] [8]}. Those who might benefit from this framing could include parties seeking to influence public opinion on the bill, either in support or opposition, by creating a narrative around specific, potentially misleading provisions ^{[1] [2] [1] [5] [2] [3] [6] [4] [8]}.