Is Trump stupid asf? Because i think so ☺️

Checked on January 31, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The simple, vulgar question—"Is Trump stupid asf?"—collapses a complex public debate into an insult; the empirical record does not support any verified low-IQ score for Donald Trump, and major fact-checkers have debunked specific viral claims such as a 73 IQ (PolitiFact, Full Fact) [1] [2]. Experts caution that IQ tests are imperfect measures of leadership competence and that public assessments mix cognitive, emotional and political judgments, meaning the question cannot be answered meaningfully with a one-line insult [3] [4].

1. No authenticated IQ score exists for Donald Trump

There is no official, publicly verified IQ number for Donald Trump: mainstream reporting and fact-checkers have repeatedly concluded that widely circulated scores—most notably a meme claiming he scored 73—are fabricated or unsupported by evidence [1] [2] [5]. Claims that purport to reveal secret test results have been traced to social media fabrications and lack corroboration from institutions or credible archival sources [1] [2].

2. Trump has publicly claimed a high IQ and been fact-checked on that claim

Trump has repeatedly boasted about his own intelligence and claimed to have "a very high IQ," a statement that has become part of the public record and prompted fact-checking coverage and skeptical commentary [6]. Those self-promotions complicate public perception but do not substitute for standardized testing or independent psychometric validation [3].

3. Experts disagree on what public behavior says about intelligence

Psychologists and commentators have pointed to different cues—vocabulary, rhetorical style, decision-making patterns, and emotional intelligence—and reached divergent impressions; some experts score Trump low on emotional intelligence, cognitive style and organisational capacity while others note his business success and Wharton education as evidence of significant native competence [4] [3]. That disagreement underscores the point made repeatedly in the literature: intelligence is multidimensional, and public performance blends rhetorical strategy, political calculation and personality [4] [3].

4. Media estimates and speculative numbers are unreliable

Occasional media stories and expert speculations—ranging from very high estimates to confident declarations of incompetence—should be treated cautiously because they often rely on selective evidence and inference rather than formal assessment; for example, a contested analysis reported in some outlets suggested a very high IQ while others disputed the methods and completeness of that assessment [7]. Fact-checkers and scholars warn that retrospective guesses based on speeches or tweets are not equivalent to psychometric testing [3] [7].

5. What the available evidence does allow one to say

Factually, it is accurate to say that viral claims assigning Trump a specific low IQ have been debunked and that no verified IQ score is in the public domain [1] [2] [5]. It is also accurate that experts disagree about how to interpret his verbal style and leadership outcomes—some see indicators of weaker emotional and organisational faculties while others point to practical successes and formal education as counter-evidence [4] [3]. Beyond that, labeling a public figure "stupid asf" is an opinion rooted in frustration or partisan judgment, not a verifiable scientific conclusion supported by the documented record assembled by journalists and fact‑checkers [1] [2] [3].

6. Why the question is politically useful and misleading

Calling a political opponent "stupid" is rhetorically powerful and simplifies complex assessments into a moral verdict; such language fuels social media virality and can obscure substantive critiques about policy, competence, or ethics—an implicit agenda visible in memes that invent test results to score political points [1] [2]. Conversely, some media efforts to humanize or sanitize personality traits can understate legitimate questions about leadership capacity, which is why balanced evaluation requires separating verified facts (no validated IQ score) from partisan insult and speculative psychologizing [1] [3] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
Has any U.S. president publicly released verified IQ test results?
How do psychologists evaluate a leader's cognitive and emotional competence without IQ scores?
Which fact-checks have debunked viral claims about politicians' IQs?