Just because there are no iq test results available doesn't mean that you could no ascertain that trump is a very, very stupid human being. he doesn't know things and he doesn't know how to thing.
Executive summary
Public reporting establishes that Donald Trump has repeatedly touted perfect scores on brief dementia screenings—most often the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)—and has used those results to underline his fitness for office [1][2]. Medical experts and the test’s creator have been clear that the MoCA screens for cognitive impairment, not intelligence or IQ, and there is no validated correspondence between a MoCA score and a person’s IQ or broad reasoning ability [3][4].
1. What the tests Trump cites actually measure
The examinations Trump and his physicians have discussed are short cognitive screens such as the MoCA, a 30‑point instrument designed to detect mild cognitive impairment and early dementia by sampling memory, attention, language and visuospatial skills, not to quantify intelligence or problem‑solving across life contexts [4][5]; the test’s creator has explicitly said there are no studies linking MoCA scores to IQ [4].
2. How Trump has presented those results and why that matters
Trump has repeatedly described taking and “acing” these brief exams in public remarks and social posts, at times framing them as evidence of superior cognitive ability and even conflating them with an “IQ test,” which has generated pushback and amusement in the media and late‑night shows [2][6][7]; outlets note he compares himself favorably to political opponents while leaning on the exams to rebut concerns about his mental fitness [1][5].
3. What experts and reporters say about reading cognitive health from appearances
Clinical commentators emphasize that cognitive screens can rule out moderate to severe impairment like Alzheimer’s or post‑stroke decline but cannot be extrapolated to overall intelligence, and publicity about specific test items can invalidate future administrations by priming answers [3][8]. Simultaneously, journalists and opinion writers have cataloged public‑facing moments—gaffes, apparent drowsiness, fractured remarks—and used them to argue there is cause for concern, though such media compilations are interpretive and reflect editorial judgment as much as medical diagnosis [9].
4. The evidentiary gap between “not impaired on a screen” and “very, very stupid”
Available reporting shows no publicly disclosed formal IQ testing or peer‑reviewed neuropsychological battery for Trump, only short clinical screens and press summaries, so firm conclusions about innate intelligence or broad reasoning capacity cannot be scientifically sustained from those sources alone [3][4]. Assertions that a person is “very, very stupid” based solely on televised slips or a lack of IQ data risk conflating momentary performance, political rhetoric, and selective media curation with enduring cognitive trait measurement—an overreach that experts caution against [8][9].
5. Political uses, incentives and competing narratives
The White House’s publicizing of perfect cognitive‑screen results serves a clear political purpose—reassuring supporters and countering narratives of decline—while critics compile behavioral episodes to argue the opposite, creating two competing storylines that reflect partisan incentives as much as medical realities [5][1]. Satirists and late‑night hosts have amplified the cultural takeaway by taking the same short tests on camera to make a point about the test’s simplicity and the limits of the comparison [7][10].
6. Bottom line for readers weighing the claim
Reporting supports the proposition that short cognitive screens Trump cites do not measure IQ and cannot by themselves justify labeling someone “very, very stupid,” while the pattern of public behavior and media‑documented gaffes fuels reasonable public concern about fitness for office; both positions are represented in the sources, but the scientific record cited in mainstream coverage does not provide the objective IQ evidence the more definitive claim requires [3][4][9].