What injuries, if any, did protesters sustain in the Palestine Action incident?

Checked on February 5, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Reporting on the Palestine Action raids and protests is inconsistent about who was hurt and how; a broad account in secondary sources says “three injuries” resulted from the August 2024 Elbit/Aztec West raid [1], while court reporting and press coverage emphasize a seriously injured police officer — a fractured spine — and separately document detainees becoming gravely unwell from prolonged hunger strikes in custody [2] [3] [4]. Precise, attributable details about injuries sustained by protesters during the specific Filton/Aztec West break‑in are limited in the available reporting and sometimes conflated with injuries to police, security staff, or later medical harms suffered in prison.

1. What the concise overviews say: “three injuries” after the August 2024 raid

A commonly cited summary — reflected in the Wikipedia entry compiled from multiple reports — states that “three injuries resulted from the August 2024 raid on Elbit at Aztec West” [1]. That short statement provides a headline figure but does not identify whether those injured were protesters, security staff or police, nor does it give medical detail or attribution; the entry aggregates events across related actions and legal proceedings [1].

2. Court and local reporting: emphasis on a seriously injured police officer

Detailed courtroom accounts and local reporting focus on a different, central injury: prosecutors told jurors that Police Sergeant Kate Evans sustained a fractured spine during the Filton action, an injury they linked to a sledgehammer strike in the chaos of the break‑in [2]. National press coverage repeated the claim that an officer’s spine was fractured and framed that injury as a key element in the prosecution’s case, while defence accounts contested the context and intent of the act [2] [5].

3. Protesters’ injuries at the scene: sparse and contested reporting

Contemporary coverage of the raid describes scuffles, sprayed extinguishing foam and sledgehammer swings as security and police tried to detain activists, but it stops short of cataloguing specific physical injuries to the protesters themselves at the scene [6]. The Independent reported allegations that security guards were sworn at, struck and sprayed as they tried to intervene — details that describe violence but do not document named or medically verified injuries to the activists [6]. The lack of contemporaneous medical or ambulatory reporting on protesters’ injuries in these pieces leaves the question of which of the reported “three injuries” applied to protesters open to interpretation [1] [6].

4. Later harms to detained activists: hunger strikes and hospitalisations

Independent of injuries sustained during the break‑in, several Palestine Action‑affiliated detainees suffered serious medical deterioration while in custody because of prolonged hunger strikes. Multiple outlets reported that hunger strikers required hospital treatment or intensive care — for example, Umer Khalid was taken to intensive care with organ failure after escalating to a thirst strike, and at least one hunger striker was hospitalised earlier in the rolling protests before ending their strike [3] [4]. Al Jazeera and the Guardian also document hospitalisations and severe physical weakness among strikers, citing Prisoners for Palestine and medical commentary [7] [8].

5. Broader context and conflicting narratives in the sources

Sources differ in emphasis and possible agenda: court and local reporting (Bristol Cable, The Independent, FT) foreground the prosecution’s claims about assault and the injured officer [2] [6] [9], while aggregate summaries and activist‑oriented pieces highlight injuries and medical crises among detainees and the political stakes of hunger strikes [1] [3] [7]. Tabloid coverage amplified the alleged grave injury to the officer in lurid terms [5], illustrating how different outlets select facts to shape the narrative. The available reporting does not deliver a unified, fully sourced list of injuries specifically sustained by protesters at the Filton/Aztec West event itself.

6. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence

Reporting supports two firm conclusions: first, summaries say three people were injured in the August 2024 Elbit/Aztec West raid [1]; second, courtroom and press reporting attributes a severe injury — a fractured spine — to a police sergeant connected to the Filton action [2]. What cannot be definitively established from the provided sources is which of the reported injuries at the scene were suffered by protesters rather than police or security, because contemporaneous articles and trial reporting either focus on officers’ injuries or on later medical harms in custody rather than listing named protesters treated immediately after the incident [1] [2] [6] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What medical evidence was presented at the Filton trial regarding injuries to police and protesters?
Which Palestine Action detainees were hospitalised during hunger strikes, and what medical statements were made by prison doctors?
How have different UK media outlets framed injuries from Palestine Action events, and what discrepancies exist in their reporting?