Did Pam Bondi actually issue a memo about prosecuting antifa and nonprofits after Trump's call?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Yes — Attorney General Pam Bondi circulated a December 4 memorandum to federal prosecutors and law enforcement directing steps to implement President Trump’s call to target Antifa and related left‑leaning groups; the memo instructs prosecutors on statutes to consider, orders the FBI to compile lists and intelligence products, and even urges review of potential tax offenses involving nonprofits [1] [2] [3].
1. What the memo actually does: operational orders, not new law
Bondi’s memo is an internal DOJ directive instructing prosecutors and federal law enforcement to prioritize investigations into “Antifa and Antifa-related” actors and to use an array of potential charges — from conspiracy and fraud statutes to RICO — where appropriate, while directing the FBI to compile lists, disseminate an intelligence bulletin, and improve tip‑line publicity [1] [2] [4]. It does not itself create new criminal statutes or a formal, legally binding designation of a domestic terrorist organization — it is an operational blueprint intended to implement NSPM‑7, the presidential memorandum referenced in the reporting [4] [5].
2. Tax audits and nonprofits: a clear instruction, and why it matters
The memo explicitly urges DOJ components to consider “any applicable tax crimes” where extremist groups are suspected of defrauding the IRS and to coordinate with Treasury for audits in some cases; reporting says Bondi directed attention to revoking tax‑exempt status and investigating nonprofit funders as part of this effort [3] [2]. Legal and civil‑liberties observers warn that using tax enforcement tools against politically active nonprofits risks chilling protected advocacy and could be perceived as weaponizing ordinary enforcement against political opponents [5] [6].
3. Scope and definition: broad, ideologically framed language
The memo adopts a sweeping set of “characteristics” for domestic terrorists that mixes conduct (rioting, doxxing, swatting) with ideological markers such as “radical gender ideology,” “extreme views in favor of mass migration,” and anti‑capitalism, which critics say converts political beliefs into investigative targets; multiple outlets flagged that the language ties closely to Trump’s NSPM‑7 and expands its reach [7] [8] [2]. Experts cited in the coverage note that Antifa is typically described as a decentralized ideology or movement rather than a formal organization, raising questions about how a list of groups would be constructed and applied [1] [2].
4. How the memo was disclosed and reported: leaks and journalistic sourcing
The document surfaced through investigative reporting and leaks — Ken Klippenstein first published a copy and outlets including The Hill, Reuters, The Guardian, and others reported on the memo’s contents after journalists reviewed it — and subsequent pieces have analyzed its potential legal and political effects [9] [2] [3]. That chain of reporting explains why some descriptions call it “leaked” while other reports treat it as a circulated internal memorandum; the underlying reporting consistently indicates the memo was issued to prosecutors and agencies on Dec. 4 [9] [2].
5. Competing interpretations and stakes for civil liberties
Supporters portray the memo as a lawful operational response to violent political extremism that directs prosecutors to “charge the most serious, readily provable offenses” and to use existing tools to disrupt networks [4]. Critics — civil‑liberties groups, some legal scholars and advocacy outlets — argue the memo’s broad ideological criteria and its push to scrutinize nonprofits and donors risk criminalizing dissent and chilling free speech; these critics label the memo a politically charged instrument that could be used to target opposition [6] [8] [5].
6. Bottom line: Bondi did issue a prosecutorial roadmap tied to Trump’s push, but legal limits remain
Pam Bondi did send an internal DOJ memorandum directing prosecutors and law enforcement to pursue investigations and to consider a wide set of charges and enforcement tools against Antifa‑aligned actors and potentially supportive nonprofits following President Trump’s directives; the memo operationalizes political guidance but does not itself change statutory law, and its implementation raises significant legal and constitutional questions that reporting and experts continue to debate [1] [2] [4].