Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: How do paper audit trails work with electronic voting systems?

Checked on June 12, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Paper audit trails, also known as VVPAT (Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail), are physical paper records generated alongside electronic votes that serve multiple crucial functions in the voting process [1]. The system creates a human-readable paper record that voters can use to verify their votes were recorded correctly, while also providing a physical backup for potential manual recounts [1]. As of 2024, this technology has achieved widespread adoption, with 98.5% of U.S. registered voters living in jurisdictions that implement some form of paper ballot system [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important aspects weren't addressed in the original question:

  • International Implementation: The system is not unique to the US - it's also used in India, Venezuela, Philippines, and Bulgaria [1]
  • System Limitations: There are notable challenges with paper audit trails:
  • They can increase voting complexity
  • May slow down the voting process
  • Face technical limitations such as thermal paper fading [1]
  • Multiple Benefits: Beyond simple verification, the system serves as:
  • A fraud detection mechanism
  • A backup for machine malfunctions
  • A means for conducting manual recounts [1]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question oversimplifies what is actually a complex system with multiple functions and challenges. While paper audit trails are indeed effective for verification, they serve multiple purposes beyond simple auditing [1].

Various stakeholders have different interests in how these systems are perceived:

  • Election officials benefit from emphasizing the security aspects
  • Voting machine manufacturers might downplay the need for paper backups
  • Democracy advocates benefit from highlighting the verification aspects
  • Local governments might focus on the cost and complexity challenges

The widespread adoption rate (98.5% in the US) suggests that despite the challenges, the benefits are considered to outweigh the drawbacks [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the security vulnerabilities of electronic voting systems without paper trails?
How do election officials conduct post-election audits using paper ballot verification?
What states require voter-verified paper audit trails for electronic voting machines?
How effective are risk-limiting audits in detecting voting system errors or tampering?
What is the difference between direct recording electronic systems and optical scan voting with paper ballots?