Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Examples of past large White House gatherings using tents?
Executive summary
Tents have been a routine, practical solution for large White House functions—especially state dinners—when indoor rooms (the East Room seats about 200) could not accommodate guest lists; presidents from recent administrations have used South Lawn tents repeatedly, with President Joe Biden holding at least four outdoor state dinners under tents and the White House often describing tents as necessary for larger events [1] [2]. Historic examples include a 1976 Rose Garden state dinner tent for Queen Elizabeth II [3]; reporting and official materials say tents cost up to about $1 million per event and have drawn criticism for logistics, lawn damage and aesthetics [3] [1] [4].
1. Why tents? The practical gap they filled
The White House’s largest indoor public room, the East Room, seats roughly 200 guests, meaning larger state dinners and big international receptions have required temporary solutions; official White House text and reporting explicitly say the residence “cannot currently host major events for world leaders without erecting a large… tent” on the grounds [2]. Administrations therefore turned to sizable temporary tents on the South Lawn to host expanded guest lists and ceremonies [4].
2. Not a new practice: a photograph from the Bicentennial era
Illustrating that tents aren’t a solely modern invention, the White House Historical Association archives show a tent erected in the Rose Garden for the July 7, 1976 state dinner honoring Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip during the U.S. Bicentennial—complete with temporary carpeting and other accommodations arranged under the first lady’s direction [3]. That image establishes a continuity of using temporary structures for high-profile White House hospitality.
3. Recent usage: multiple state dinners under canvas
Contemporary summaries state that President Joe Biden held four of his six state dinners outdoors using tents, demonstrating the continued reliance on temporary structures for major diplomatic events in the 21st century [1]. Multiple outlets and officials note that tents remain the “go-to” when guest lists exceed indoor capacity [4] [5].
4. Criticisms: cost, comfort and the “unsightly” label
Former White House staff and outside commentators have described tents as expensive and awkward—costs for some tented events have been reported at $1 million or more, not counting extra infrastructure such as portable restrooms and transportation shuttles—while Presidents and aides have sometimes called the installations “not a pretty sight” [1] [4] [6]. Critics also argue tents can damage the South Lawn and require extensive logistics to approximate an indoor formal experience [7] [6].
5. Politics and projects: why a permanent ballroom resurfaced
Pushback against tents—framed by some officials as impractical and by others as a loss of historical usage—helped fuel proposals for permanent additional event space. The Trump administration publicly advocated building a large White House ballroom to eliminate the recurring need for tents; a White House statement and related coverage present the ballroom as a solution to the “large and unsightly tent” situation and to accommodate up to roughly 900–999 guests in future events [8] [5]. Supporters argue it would save recurring rental costs and protect the lawn; opponents point to historical preservation and ethical concerns around private funding [5] [4].
6. Competing perspectives inside and outside the White House
Advocates for a permanent ballroom stress practical benefits—fewer tent rentals, less lawn damage, and in some pitch materials potential long-term cost savings—while former event staff, some historians and critics emphasize tradition, the East Wing’s social history, and worries about large-scale construction and donor influence on a public historic site [7] [5] [4]. Reporting captures both views: some former staff called tents “embarrassing” for cramped seating, while others defended outdoor state dinners as longstanding practice [1] [6].
7. What the record does and does not show
Available sources provide clear examples of tents used for state dinners (1976 Queen Elizabeth II tent; multiple Biden-era tented state dinners) and document debates over cost, aesthetics and lawn damage [3] [1] [4]. Sources do not, however, provide a comprehensive list of every tented White House event across administrations or an itemized accounting of every tent’s exact cost—those specifics are “not found in current reporting” among the supplied documents [3] [1].
8. Bottom line for readers
Tents have served as a recurring, pragmatic workaround for large White House gatherings for decades; they are historically attested (at least as far back as 1976) and commonly used in recent administrations, but they carry trade-offs—high per-event costs, logistics that can strain the South Lawn, and disputes over optics—that have prompted a push by some officials to build permanent indoor capacity [3] [1] [5].