Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What role did the Pentagon play in National Guard deployment on January 6th?
1. Summary of the results
The Pentagon played a significant role in delaying the National Guard deployment during the January 6th Capitol riot. Key findings show:
- The first National Guard members didn't arrive until 5:40 PM, nearly 4 hours after the initial breach at 2 PM [1]
- Major General William Walker testified that troops could have been deployed within 20 minutes of approval [2]
- Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller only approved full National Guard mobilization at 3:04 PM [1]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial contextual elements need to be considered:
- Only the president, defense secretary, and U.S. Army secretary have the authority to activate the DC National Guard [3]
- The Pentagon claims that Capitol Police did not request National Guard troops prior to the event, despite military offers [1]
- Pentagon officials were reportedly concerned about the "optics" of military presence and wanted to carefully understand troop assignments [2]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
There are conflicting narratives about the Pentagon's role:
*Official Pentagon Position:
- Defense officials emphasize the lack of pre-event requests from Capitol Police [1]
- The Department of Defense Inspector General report defended the Pentagon's actions [4]
Congressional Investigation Findings:*
- The House Administration Subcommittee claims the Pentagon deliberately delayed the response [4]
- The subcommittee suggests the DoD Inspector General report mischaracterized the Pentagon's actions [4]
- Evidence shows senior Pentagon leaders prevented the National Guard from deploying at 3 PM, despite troops being ready and capable [4]
Those benefiting from the "delayed response" narrative include congressional oversight committees and political opponents of the then-administration. Those benefiting from the "proper procedures were followed" narrative include Pentagon leadership and the previous administration's officials who were in charge during the events.