What primary documents and sources does Peter Schweizer cite in The Invisible Coup, and are they publicly available?

1. What Schweizer publicly claims to rely on

Promotional descriptions and interviews emphasize that Schweizer’s account rests on confidential documents, intercepted communications, and years of “forensic fieldwork,” framing those materials as the foundation for claims about “weaponized immigration” and foreign influence operations inside the U.S. ^{[1] [2] [5]}. Media appearances summarized by CBS and Fox repeat those claims and characterize the book as revealing networks involving diplomatic missions, NGOs, and criminal groups, but those reports quote Schweizer’s assertions rather than itemize the primary records themselves ^{[6] [5]}.

2. Where the public trail runs cold: no itemized document list in available reporting

The catalogue descriptions, publisher pages and the book’s promotional website reiterate that Schweizer worked from confidential documents and intercepted communications, yet none of the accessible listings or interviews linked in the reporting provide an itemized inventory of those primary sources or links to them ^{[1] [2] [4]}. Based on the material shown in these sources, it is not possible to verify which specific government records, diplomatic cables, intercepted messages, or NGO documents he cites, nor whether those materials are publicly posted or under legal restriction ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Availability of Schweizer’s book versus availability of his sources

The Invisible Coup is commercially available in hardcover, audiobook and digital formats through mainstream sellers and platforms—Barnes & Noble, Audible, Google Play/Apple Books and the book’s promotional site are among the retail and distribution entries referenced in the reporting ^{[1] [3] [4] [7]}. Those listings confirm access to Schweizer’s narrative and presumably to the book’s bibliography and endnotes, but the reporting does not extract or reproduce those notes, so the public availability of the primary documents he claims to have used remains unspecified ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Context: author’s institutional ties and past controversies that affect source scrutiny

Promotional materials identify Schweizer as president of the Government Accountability Institute, an affiliation readers should note when tracing source provenance and possible institutional agendas ^{[1] [4]}. Independent reporting summarized on Wikipedia flags earlier controversies in Schweizer’s work—past claims in previous books were later questioned by reporters who could not locate named sources or corroborating meetings—an important caveat when primary-source claims are not independently documented in the public record ^[8].

5. How to verify the primary documents (what the reporting suggests, and what it doesn’t)

The material examined suggests the next verification steps rather than providing them: consult the book’s own notes and bibliography (available in the purchased book editions listed), request copies or descriptions of the “confidential documents” from Schweizer or his publisher, and pursue public records routes (FOIA, consular records, court filings) where possible; none of these concrete source locations are enumerated in the available promotional reporting, so their public availability cannot be confirmed here ^{[1] [4] [2]}.

6. Bottom line for readers and researchers

The sources examined substantiate that Schweizer claims a body of confidential primary materials underpins The Invisible Coup and that the book is widely distributed, but they do not supply a public, itemized list of those documents nor evidence that the documents themselves are publicly accessible; readers seeking confirmation must consult the book’s citations and contact the publisher or author for access details, mindful of the author’s institutional ties and past reporting disputes noted in independent coverage ^{[1] [2] [8]}.