Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many politicians have been attacked since 2016, and what were their party affiliations?
Executive Summary
Since 2016 reporting and datasets assembled in the provided sources indicate a substantial and rising number of attacks on politicians, affecting multiple parties across countries and escalating in frequency and severity in recent years. German government data and investigative reports document thousands of incidents between 2019 and 2023 with party-specific trends, while later incidents in 2025 illustrate ongoing threats to politicians from a variety of parties and regions [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. Why the headline numbers show a surge—and what they actually count
Official summaries and investigative articles point to a marked increase in recorded attacks on politicians beginning around 2016 and accelerating into 2019–2023, with one analysis citing over 10,500 incidents in that 2019–2023 window and 739 attacks just in the first half of 2023 reported by the Innenministerium [1] [2]. These tallies mix a spectrum of conduct—from verbal abuse, threats, and intimidation to physical assaults and devices left at offices—so the aggregate figure reflects both criminal violence and politically motivated harassment. The data therefore show rising prevalence but combine different severity levels, making contextual interpretation essential.
2. Which parties were most frequently targeted in the German data—and how that changed
German sources indicate disproportionate targeting of certain parties, with the Greens reportedly the most frequently targeted, followed by the AfD and SPD in some summaries; official Interior Ministry figures noted increases for Greens from 75 to 301 incidents and for the SPD from 95 to 153 in a specific reporting period [1] [2]. The pattern suggests both surge effects and shifting targets over time, likely tied to public prominence, policy positions, and the visibility of individual politicians. The data do not assert intent homogeneously; many incidents involved verbal abuse and threats rather than physical attacks, complicating direct comparisons of danger across parties [2].
3. Election-period intimidation and the qualitative picture from interviews
A BBC questionnaire during an election cycle documented intimidation, stalking, harassment, threats, and occasional physical attacks, painting a qualitative picture that complements official tallies by capturing underreported experiences of politicians and campaign staff [3]. These accounts emphasize the chilling effect of persistent abuse on democratic participation and call for enhanced security measures. The qualitative data show the human impact behind statistics: repeated threats and harassment create sustained risk and deterrence, even when not every incident is logged as a formal criminal case [3].
4. Recent 2025 incidents show the problem persists and crosses borders
Later incidents cataloged in 2025 illustrate continued and transnational dimensions of attacks on politicians: a Pakistani PTI politician implicated in a police attack case, death threats and vandalized campaign posters against a German mayoral candidate, and a pipe-bomb device left at a Sinn Féin office in Northern Ireland [4] [5] [6]. These events demonstrate that political violence ranges from localized threats to devices intended to intimidate or harm offices, and that varied party affiliations—PTI, Greens, SPD, Sinn Féin and others—have been affected, underscoring that targeting is not confined to a single ideological camp [4] [5] [6].
5. How the timeline and sources differ—and why that matters
The sources vary by date and scope: German ministry counts and analyses emphasize 2019–2023 numerical trends [1] [2], the BBC provides contemporaneous election-period qualitative reporting from 2024 [3], and 2025 items document discrete violent incidents (p3_s1–p3_s3). This chronology shows both long-term upward trends and episodic spikes, and the diversity of sources—official statistics, journalism, and incident reports—highlights methodological differences in collection, definition, and reporting. Comparing these timelines reveals that headline totals are shaped by evolving recording practices and by heightened media attention during elections and after high-profile attacks.
6. What remains unclear from the assembled evidence
The provided materials leave several critical gaps: exact cumulative counts of distinct politicians attacked since 2016 are not consolidated across jurisdictions; the severity distribution (verbal vs. physical) is inconsistently reported; and attribution of motive or perpetrator demographics is often absent. The data combine multiple countries and reporting frameworks, so deriving a single global or national count of affected individuals and their party affiliations since 2016 requires harmonized datasets not present here. Clarifying these points would demand access to raw incident logs and standardized definitions across agencies.
7. Bottom line for readers seeking an answer to “how many and which parties?”
Available sources show a substantial and rising volume of attacks on politicians since 2016, with documented spikes in 2019–2023 and continuing serious incidents in 2024–2025; parties frequently named in the German reporting include the Greens, AfD, and SPD, while other countries’ incidents affect parties like PTI and Sinn Féin [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. However, a definitive count of how many individual politicians were attacked and a complete, comparable breakdown by party across all jurisdictions is not provided in these sources and would require consolidated, standardized data collection to produce.