Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did the president invoke the alien insurrection act?
1. Summary of the results
The president has NOT invoked the Insurrection Act [1]. While there has been military deployment, it was specifically done under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, not the Insurrection Act [2]. However, there appears to be some confusion because Trump did invoke a different act - the Alien Enemies Act in March 2025, specifically targeting Venezuelan gang members [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important contextual elements need to be considered:
- The Trump administration deliberately worked to avoid escalation through the Insurrection Act, with lawyers specifically structuring military deployments under different legal frameworks [4]
- While troops were deployed, they were sent on temporary duty without direct civilian law enforcement powers [5]
- The Alien Enemies Act invocation, which did occur, was later ruled unlawful by a federal judge in Texas [3]
- The Supreme Court initially allowed the deportation process but later issued an emergency order halting it [6]
- A national security report on border conditions that could potentially recommend invoking the Insurrection Act is still pending [7]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
Several sources of confusion and potential misinformation exist:
- Social media posts suggesting a "secret signing" of the Insurrection Act are explicitly false [1]
- Trump's campaign rhetoric about using the Alien Enemies Act in late 2024 [6] may have contributed to confusion about which acts were actually invoked
- The existence of an executive order that mentions the Insurrection Act in relation to border conditions [8] might be misinterpreted as an actual invocation
- Trump's ambiguous statement that invoking the act "depends on whether or not there is an insurrection" [2] may have led to speculation and misinterpretation
Those who benefit from spreading misinformation about the Insurrection Act include:
- Political actors seeking to create panic or uncertainty about martial law
- Social media influencers generating engagement through sensationalized claims
- Opposition groups trying to paint the administration as more extreme than its actual actions