Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the most notable pardons issued by President Biden so far?
Executive Summary
President Biden’s most notable clemency actions through early 2025 include a large number of commutations and pardons that, by some counts, make his administration the most active in modern presidential clemency, and a high-profile set of preemptive pardons issued in January 2025 to relatives, former officials and Jan. 6 committee members that drew intense public scrutiny. The corpus of actions combines routine grants for nonviolent offenders with politically charged blanket moves that opponents framed as partisan protection and allies described as shielding public servants from anticipated politicized prosecutions [1] [2].
1. Why Biden’s January 2025 preemptive pardons became a headline-making political flashpoint
In his final hours before the 2025 transition, President Biden issued preemptive pardons for family members, senior officials such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and Gen. Mark Milley, and several members of the House Jan. 6 investigative panel, an action the White House framed as protection against “politically motivated” prosecutions under the incoming administration. Critics seized on the timing and breadth of those pardons, arguing they were unprecedented uses of clemency to shield allies and relatives; supporters argued they were a legitimate executive use of clemency to prevent weaponized prosecutions. Reporting emphasizes the political stakes more than legal novelty [2] [3].
2. The quantitative picture: how Biden’s clemency totals compare historically
Analyses compiled in early February 2025 counted thousands of acts of clemency under Biden—commutations and pardons combined—making his total larger than any prior president’s in comparable recent records, according to a February 7, 2025 analysis [1]. That numeric comparison frames Biden as unusually active on clemency and is used by advocates to show a policy emphasis on correcting drug-sentencing disparities and other systemic injustices, while opponents point to high-profile political pardons to argue the administration’s use of clemency was selective and politically motivated. The statistics underscore both scale and contested interpretation [1].
3. The most publicly visible individual pardons and who they involve
The clemency list explicitly named family members (including his brothers and sister), public-health adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired Gen. Mark Milley, and several Jan. 6 committee staff or members, according to contemporaneous accounts of the January 20, 2025 actions; coverage repeatedly highlights those individuals because they link clemency to the Biden family and to the polarized aftermath of the Jan. 6 investigations. Coverage also notes broader categories—drug offenders and nonviolent convicts—were the focus of many commutations, illustrating a mix of high-profile political grants and standard policy-driven clemency [4] [2] [5].
4. The administration’s stated rationale versus critics’ charges of impropriety
The administration said these pardons sought to prevent politically motivated prosecutions and to protect public servants and relatives from retaliatory legal action, emphasizing presidential discretion in clemency decisions. Opponents countered that pardoning family members and key administration figures looked like self-protection and an inappropriate use of executive power; media scrutiny focused on whether aides played an outsized role in drafting or signaling pardons. The White House publicly denied that aides granted clemency without Biden’s knowledge and asserted the President made the decisions himself [6] [2].
5. Legal context and how these actions fit within historical precedent
Presidential clemency is broad and historically has included controversial choices—such as Gerald Ford’s Nixon pardon and Jimmy Carter’s draft-dodger amnesty—making the power legally uncontested but politically consequential. Observers use those precedents to place Biden’s January 2025 moves in context: legal authority is clear, but political fallout depends on public judgment about motive and fairness. The existence of long lists of past pardons shows the presidency has always used clemency both for individual mercy and political calculation, a dual-purpose pattern mirrored in Biden’s record [7].
6. What independent analyses emphasize about long-term impact and transparency
Research assessments emphasize that while Biden’s clemency numbers are high, the policy effects—on mass incarceration, racial disparities, and prosecutorial incentives—depend on implementation details, transparency, and follow-up reforms. Analysts also flagged the need for clearer documentation and consistent processes to reduce perceptions of cronyism, suggesting that numeric leadership on clemency does not automatically translate into durable criminal-justice reforms without institutional safeguards and public reporting [1] [5].
7. Bottom line: what remains settled and what remains disputed
Factually, Biden granted a large volume of clemency acts and issued high-profile preemptive pardons in January 2025 to relatives, Fauci, Milley and Jan. 6 panel members; these are documented and undisputed elements of the record. The key disputes concern motive, propriety, and policy impact—whether those pardons were protective justice or partisan shielding, and whether the administration’s broader clemency totals yield meaningful reform—questions that commentators and partisans continue to contest and that require further independent review and transparent records to settle fully [2] [3] [1].