Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Can the president deploy marines in Los Angeles?

Checked on June 9, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The president has specific, limited powers to deploy Marines domestically. Currently, about 700 Marines have been temporarily deployed to Los Angeles, but they are not directly participating in civilian law enforcement as the Insurrection Act has not been invoked [1]. The deployment appears to be more of a strategic repositioning, with Marines moving from 29 Palms to Camp Pendleton, primarily to protect federal personnel and property [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements need to be considered:

  • The Insurrection Act, while available, requires specific legal procedures, including potentially requesting governor approval and issuing a formal proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse [3]
  • This type of deployment, while rare, is not unprecedented - similar actions occurred during Hurricane Katrina and 9/11 [1]
  • The current deployment is specifically related to ongoing protests over immigration raids [4]
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and House Speaker Mike Johnson have framed this as "maintaining peace through strength" [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question oversimplifies a complex legal and operational situation. Several stakeholders have different interests:

  • Federal Government: Benefits from appearing strong and in control - as evidenced by House Speaker Johnson's rhetoric about "peace through strength" [5]
  • State Government: California Governor Newsom's office appears to be downplaying the significance, characterizing it as merely a "base-to-base movement" [2]
  • Military Leadership: The distinction between "mobilization" versus "deployment" is carefully maintained [2], suggesting a desire to avoid appearing as a domestic police force
  • Historical Context: The 1992 Rodney King riots precedent [6] is often cited to justify such deployments, though the current situation appears to be operating under different legal parameters
Want to dive deeper?
What is the Posse Comitatus Act and how does it limit military deployment domestically?
Under what circumstances can the president invoke the Insurrection Act?
What are the legal differences between deploying National Guard versus active duty military domestically?
How does the Stafford Act allow federal military assistance during natural disasters?
What historical precedents exist for presidents deploying military forces in American cities?