Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Can the president deploy National Guard troops across state lines without permission?

Checked on June 8, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Yes, the president can deploy National Guard troops across state lines without state governor permission, but only under specific legal frameworks and extraordinary circumstances. This power comes from two main sources:

  • The Insurrection Act (sections 332-334 of Title 10 U.S. Code) [1]
  • "10 U.S.C. 12406" which allows deployment in cases of rebellion or danger of rebellion against federal authority [2]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original question:

*Historical Precedent:

  • This power has only been used four times in the last century, all related to school desegregation [1]
  • The most recent deployment before 2025 occurred in 1965 during the civil rights era [2]
  • A recent example occurred when President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles without Governor Newsom's approval [3]

Important Limitations:

  • Such deployment should be considered a "last resort" [4]
  • When deployed, troops are limited in their roles - for example, in the Los Angeles case, they were restricted to protecting federal agents, not conducting law enforcement [3]
  • The deployment carries significant risks, including:
  • Potential threats to constitutional liberties
  • Distraction of military personnel from core national security duties [4]

**3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement**

The original question oversimplifies a complex legal and political issue. Several groups have stakes in how this power is perceived:

Federal Government:

  • Benefits from broader interpretation of presidential powers
  • Can use this power to enforce federal authority when states resist [1]

State Governments:

  • Local politicians like Governor Newsom have opposed such deployments as potentially "illegal" [3]
  • States lose control over their National Guard units when federalized [1]

Law Enforcement:*

  • Federal agencies like ICE benefit from additional protection and support [3]
  • Local law enforcement may face conflicts of authority and jurisdiction

The question's simplicity might lead people to overlook the extraordinary nature of this power and its significant implications for federal-state relations.

Want to dive deeper?
What is the difference between federalizing National Guard and regular deployment?
Can state governors refuse federal orders to deploy their National Guard units?
What legal authority does the Insurrection Act give the president over National Guard?
How has presidential use of National Guard for domestic operations changed over time?
What role does Congress play in authorizing National Guard deployments across states?