Are there presidential private recreational spaces not open to public tours and which presidents used them most?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Presidents have long used private recreational spaces — Camp David, presidential yachts, and off-site private residences — that are normally closed to public tours; Camp David has been the official retreat since 1942 [1] [2]. Modern additions and private projects (for example the 2025 Trump-backed White House ballroom project) show an ongoing pattern of creating executive-only facilities, sometimes privately funded and not part of public tour routes [3] [4].
1. The official retreat the public rarely sees: Camp David’s role and history
Camp David has been the U.S. president’s mountain retreat since Franklin D. Roosevelt transformed a Maryland site into “Shangri-La” in 1942; presidents use it for relaxation and private diplomacy and it is not open to routine public tours [1] [2]. Reporting and institutional histories emphasize Camp David’s privacy and security role — it is a Naval Support Facility and designed for presidential seclusion and secure meetings rather than public visitation [1] [2].
2. Private residences and “Summer/Winter White Houses” that have been de facto off-limits
Many presidents relied on private homes or compounds as working retreats — Mar-a-Lago for Donald Trump, Prairie Chapel Ranch for George W. Bush, Rancho del Cielo for Ronald Reagan, and Nixon’s Key Biscayne compound — and those sites functioned as private spaces not part of White House public tours [5] [6] [7]. Some of those properties hosted official business while remaining private or semi-private, creating de facto restricted presidential recreational spaces [5] [7].
3. The White House itself contains private and public wings; tours have limits
The White House operates public tours on a routed basis, but many functional and recreational spaces are either off-tour or controlled for security and official use. In 2025 the White House announced a reopening of public tours on a defined route (December 2025) — demonstrating that access is selective and can change administratively [8]. At the same time, a major privately funded ballroom project announced in 2025 involves space that was previously occupied by East Wing offices and is not described as a public-tour space [9] [4].
4. New construction undercuts tour coverage: the Trump ballroom case
Reporting shows the 2025 effort to build a large, privately funded White House ballroom will displace existing office space and expand areas not intended for routine public visitation; the project’s proponents say it is privately financed and won’t cost taxpayers [3] [4]. Coverage also notes controversies over donor disclosure, tree removal, and planning, underlining that new executive recreational or event spaces can be created outside typical tour footprints [4] [3].
5. Which presidents used private recreational spaces most — competing ways to measure it
There is no single metric in the sources for “used them most.” Historical accounts highlight heavy users: Franklin D. Roosevelt established and used Camp David; Dwight Eisenhower regularly used his Gettysburg farm and other retreats; Richard Nixon visited his Florida compound more than 50 times while in office [1] [10] [7]. Other presidents — Reagan at Rancho del Cielo, George H.W. Bush at Walker’s Point, Trump at Mar‑a‑Lago and more recently pursuing a private ballroom — also figure prominently in source narratives [6] [11] [12] [4]. Available sources do not provide a ranked count comparing total usage across every president.
6. Public interest and the hidden agendas behind restricted access
Sources show two recurring drivers behind restricted access: security/privacy needs (Camp David’s military administration and protected status) and political or financial choices (private funding of White House projects, selective donor disclosure) [1] [3] [4]. The White House’s framing of privately funded projects as “paid for by patriots” signals an agenda to shift optics away from taxpayer expense even as critics and reporters raise transparency questions [3] [4].
7. What is verifiable and what isn’t in current reporting
Verifiable: Camp David’s status as the presidential retreat since 1942 [1]; the 2025 White House ballroom project and its private‑funding claims, donor disclosure controversies, and planning milestones reported across White House and press sources [4] [3] [9]. Not found in current reporting: a comprehensive tally that definitively lists which president “used” private recreational spaces most by visits or days — available sources do not mention a ranked, quantitative usage list.
8. Bottom line for readers
U.S. presidents have long had recreational spaces off-limits to the public: an official, secured Camp David; private personal residences called “Summer” or “Winter” White Houses; and selective White House rooms and new annexes that are not part of standard tours [1] [5] [4]. Historical patterns and recent projects show both privacy/security rationales and political/financial motivations shape who gets access and what visitors can see; for a precise ranking of “most-used” retreats, the sources reviewed do not provide the necessary comparative data.