Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How does the presidential salary compare to that of the Vice President?
Executive Summary
The President of the United States receives a fixed annual salary of $400,000, while the Vice President’s received pay is commonly reported as $235,100 in practice due to a pay freeze, though the statutory rate is $284,600. This creates a real-world gap in annual pay of roughly $164,900, meaning the President’s salary is about 70% higher than the take-home Vice Presidential salary when the freeze is applied [1] [2] [3] [4]. Supplementary presidential allowances and the VP’s statutorily higher but frozen rate complicate simple comparisons [4] [2].
1. The headline numbers that everyone cites — who earns what and why it looks different
The baseline, statutory compensation for the President is $400,000, a figure set by Congress in 2001 and repeatedly confirmed in historical salary summaries [1] [4] [5]. The Vice President’s statutory salary is $284,600, but multiple sources note a pay freeze that has kept actual pay at $235,100 since 2019, creating divergence between listed and paid amounts [2] [3] [1]. The practical gap — President $400,000 versus Vice President $235,100 — is the comparison most often used in reporting and public understanding and explains claims that the President earns about 70% more than the VP [1] [2].
2. Why statutory and actual pay differ — the role of the federal pay freeze
The discrepancy between the Vice President’s statutory rate and the amount actually paid stems from a broader federal pay freeze for certain senior officials that has been in effect since 2019, carried forward by OPM actions and administrative decisions [2] [3]. The statutory figure of $284,600 remains on paper, but the freeze limits increases and leaves the cash-paid rate at $235,100. This administrative context matters because headline comparisons that use statutory figures without noting the freeze can overstate the practical earnings gap, and failing to explain the freeze omits a key policy choice that affects executive branch compensation [2] [3].
3. Total compensation beyond base salary — the President’s extra allowances
Comparisons that focus solely on the base salary miss material non-salary benefits. The President receives additional budgeted allowances — a $50,000 expense account, a $100,000 nontaxable travel account, and a $19,000 entertainment budget — which increase the effective value of the office beyond the $400,000 base [4]. While these allowances are meant to cover official duties and cannot be treated as take-home pay in the same way as salary, they are cashable resources allocated to support the functions of managing the presidency and contribute to the comparative economic value of the position relative to the Vice Presidency [4].
4. Different reporting choices lead to different headlines — watch the math
Analysts and news outlets choose different denominators when comparing presidential and vice-presidential pay: some compare statutory numbers, others use frozen, pay-actual numbers, and some add allowances. Using the frozen VP rate ($235,100) against the President’s base pay yields a ~70% differential, while comparing statutory VP pay ($284,600) narrows the gap to about 40%—so context changes the narrative significantly [1] [2] [3]. Reports that fail to state whether they use statutory or payable rates risk misleading readers about the magnitude of the gap [1] [5].
5. Sources, dates, and why the most recent context matters
The $400,000 presidential base is affirmed in recent summaries up to 2025, and reporting on VP pay cites the 2019 freeze and subsequent administrative practice through 2024 and 2025 summaries [4] [3] [2]. Because compensation policy can change via Congress or OPM actions, the publication dates on these sources matter: the freeze was instituted in 2019, and later summaries through 2024–2025 reiterate its continued effect on actual VP pay [3] [4]. Readers should prefer the newest reporting when assessing whether statutory versus actual pay has been altered.
6. Competing narratives and possible agendas behind coverage
Coverage emphasizing large presidential pay advantages often aims to dramatize inequality between the two offices or bolster arguments about executive compensation; coverage stressing statutory VP pay can imply the President’s advantage is smaller. Articles highlighting personal earning potential for a Vice President after leaving office pursue a different agenda—focusing on future private earnings rather than current public pay—and unrelated pieces have been flagged as noncontributory to the salary comparison [6]. Evaluations should therefore check whether a story’s focus is current base pay, total compensation, or future market opportunities.
7. Bottom line for readers who want a single, context-rich answer
The clearest answer is that the President’s base salary is $400,000 and the Vice President’s paid salary has been $235,100 under an ongoing pay freeze, with a statutory VP rate of $284,600 still listed on paper; the working, pay-received gap is roughly $164,900, about 70% of the VP’s paid salary. That figure should be understood alongside presidential allowances and the policy choices that have kept the VP’s pay frozen, and readers should check for updates because Congress or OPM could change statutory or payable rates in the future [1] [2] [3] [4].