Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which presidents signed continuing resolutions from 2010 to 2024 and what party were they?
Executive Summary
From the provided analyses, the core factual finding is that continuing resolutions (CRs) were signed throughout 2010–2024 by the presidents in office—Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden—but the supplied materials do not present a definitive, itemized list linking every CR enacted in that period to the exact presidential signature dates. The supplied sources establish the three presidents and their parties—Obama (Democrat), Trump (Republican), Biden (Democrat)—as the officeholders during 2010–2024 and note many CRs across those years, but they stop short of a complete roll-call of signatures [1] [2] [3].
1. Why the claim is partially verifiable but incomplete — what the sources actually say
The analyses consistently report that CRs were numerous from FY2010 through FY2024 and that presidents in that span included Barack Obama (Democrat), Donald Trump (Republican), and Joe Biden (Democrat), implying those presidents signed CRs while in office. Multiple sources note high CR frequency—47 CRs between FY2010 and FY2022 and dozens more across FY1977–FY2025—showing CRs are a routine congressional tool when appropriations stall [1] [2] [4]. None of the supplied excerpts, however, compiles a definitive list of each CR by fiscal year matched to the exact presidential signature, so the claim that “which presidents signed CRs from 2010–2024” is only partially addressed: the identities and party affiliations of presidents are clear, but a precise signature catalogue is not present in the provided text [5] [6].
2. The procedural reality: CRs are enacted across administrations and typically bear the sitting president’s signature
The supplied materials emphasize the institutional pattern: Congress enacts CRs repeatedly when full appropriations are not completed, and enacted CRs become law when the sitting president signs them. Given that CRs existed in nearly every fiscal year and that the period 2010–2024 spans the Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies, each of those presidents would have been the signatory on CRs enacted during their terms. The analyses underscore an increase in CR use in eras of divided government and partisan contention, making CRs a bipartisan phenomenon and not the exclusive domain of any single party [6] [4]. That procedural linkage explains why attributing CRs in a period necessarily implicates the president in office at the time, but it does not substitute for a specific, year-by-year signature list [2].
3. Divergent emphases in the supplied documents — frequency, political context, and missing specifics
One set of analyses emphasizes the frequency and institutional role of CRs, noting averages and historical counts (e.g., 207 CRs from FY1977–FY2025, many CRs in FY2010–FY2022), while another points to specific recent CRs such as CRs tied to late-2024 funding and early-2025 measures attributed to President Biden in the supplied snippet [5] [3]. The tension in the supplied material is between comprehensive statistical coverage and episodic reporting of recent CRs; the documents collectively show that CRs span administrations and parties but omit a consolidated ledger linking each CR between 2010 and 2024 to the exact signing president and statutory citation [1] [7].
4. What can be firmly concluded from these sources and what requires further documentary work
From the provided analyses one can firmly conclude that Barack Obama (Democrat), Donald Trump (Republican), and Joe Biden (Democrat) were the presidents in office from 2010 through 2024 and that CRs were repeatedly enacted during that span, making those presidents the de facto signatories for CRs enacted while they held office. What cannot be concluded from the supplied texts is a year-by-year, statute-by-statute list of CRs and who signed each specific CR; assembling that would require consulting the public laws and Statutes at Large or the Congressional Record for each CR in FY2010–FY2024 [2] [3]. The current evidence supports identity and party but lacks granular signature mapping [5] [4].
5. Multiple viewpoints and potential agendas in the supplied analyses
The excerpts display different emphases that reflect potential analytical agendas: some pieces stress the routine and nonpartisan mechanics of CRs as a congressional tool, while others highlight political standoffs and electoral-era conflicts when CRs and shutdown threats arise. Documents that stress frequency could be interpreted as normalizing CRs as governance tools, while those calling out standoffs may implicitly critique partisan behavior. Readers should note that none of the supplied materials attempts to absolve or blame a single party for CR frequency; instead, they portray CRs as bipartisan outcomes of congressional-executive negotiation [6] [1].
6. Practical next steps to close the factual gap if a definitive list is required
To produce the requested definitive list—every continuing resolution signed from 2010 through 2024 and the party of the signing president—one must consult primary legal records: the U.S. Statutes at Large, the Office of the Federal Register, Congress.gov public laws for each fiscal year, or CRS compilations that enumerate CRs by public law number and signature date. The supplied analyses point precisely to that gap and the appropriate documentary sources to fill it; the current corpus confirms which presidents held office and that CRs were numerous, but a targeted legislative-record search is necessary to produce the line-level signature inventory [3] [2].