Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How widespread is merchandise endorsing Trump despite sexual misconduct allegations?
Executive summary
Merchandise promoting Donald Trump is pervasive online and in political spaces: Trump’s official store reported more than $3 million in sales in 2023 and added 168 products around the 2024–25 transition (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) [1] [2]. Independent and platform data also show large third‑party commerce in Trump-branded goods — firms report roughly $140 million in Trump-themed Amazon sales between April and September 2024 — and the Trump Organization is suing alleged counterfeit sellers on Amazon, eBay and Walmart [3] [4].
1. How big is “official” Trump merchandise?
The Trump Organization’s official retail site, trumpstore.com, is a durable, broad catalog selling apparel, drinkware, memorabilia and luxury items directly tied to the brand [5]. Investigations by watchdog group CREW counted 168 new products added between election day and inauguration week and reported the store had recorded more than $3 million in sales in 2023 — figures CREW highlighted as part of a push to “monetize the presidency” [2] [1]. Independent reporting also documents high‑visibility displays of official items inside White House spaces used by President Trump, reinforcing the overlap between presidency and merchandising [6].
2. How much unofficial or third‑party merch exists?
Multiple outlets and industry data say Trump‑branded goods flood online marketplaces. Omnisend/JungleScout data cited in reporting found dramatic sales volumes, and one report cites about $140 million of Trump‑themed sales on Amazon over a six‑month period in 2024, far outstripping comparable figures for Vice President Harris gear [3]. Tech and culture outlets describe unauthorized MAGA items as “everywhere online” and at rallies, where independent sellers and DIY vendors commonly hawk T‑shirts, signs and other paraphernalia [7].
3. Legal fight over “who owns” the merch
The Trump Organization has moved aggressively to control that market: it filed lawsuits accusing unnamed sellers on Amazon, Walmart and eBay of hawking counterfeit or unauthorized Trump merchandise and seeking to compel marketplaces to destroy alleged fakes and close accounts [4] [8]. Trade press and tech outlets note the company is using a relatively aggressive Schedule A trademark strategy and that the legal push raises questions about why the organization chose to litigate now versus letting third‑party sales act as free advertising [9] [7].
4. What about the sexual‑misconduct allegations — do they dent demand?
Available sources in this set document large, sustained sales of Trump merchandise and widespread availability across official and unofficial channels even after multiple controversies; CREW and e‑commerce data do not link sales drops to misconduct allegations [2] [3]. None of the provided articles directly measure whether sexual‑misconduct allegations reduced demand or changed buyer behavior; that question is not found in current reporting supplied here. Where reporting does weigh in, it emphasizes continuing profitability and broad distribution rather than declines tied to those allegations [1] [10].
5. Who benefits and what are the conflicts?
Reporting highlights direct profit streams to Trump‑linked entities: CREW and earlier business pieces note millions in sales and licensing revenue routed through entity names such as CIC Ventures and CIC Digital in past disclosures [2] [10]. Journalistic accounts raise ethical questions about a president personally profiting from branded merchandise and the potential for conflicts between personal business interests and public office, while noting that monetization of the transition period was “unprecedented” [2] [11].
6. Two competing narratives in the coverage
One narrative — advanced by watchdogs and critical outlets — portrays the merchandising as a deliberate profit engine that blurred public and private roles and capitalized on presidential visibility [2] [1]. The other, reflected in business and legal coverage, treats the merch market as standard brand protection and commerce: the Trump Organization argues it must defend trademarks and customer trust against unauthorized sellers, and some IP experts suggest enforcement is consistent with how other brands operate [9] [4].
7. Bottom line and reporting limits
Trump‑related merchandise is widespread: official stores generate millions and third‑party platform sales reached large multiples of that in 2024 data cited by outlets [2] [3]. Whether sexual‑misconduct allegations specifically reduced that consumer appetite is not addressed in the provided reporting — available sources do not mention direct measures of demand change tied to those allegations [1] [3]. The coverage supplied mixes investigative watchdog findings, platform sales data, and legal filings; each highlights a different facet — profitability, ubiquity, and brand‑protection — which together show a robust merch ecosystem around Trump.