Which professional organizations or advocacy groups publicly back Julie Green?
Executive summary
Public records and the set of documents provided show that Julie Greene has received endorsements noted on Ballotpedia and that she operates a registered nonprofit called Julie Green Ministries, but none of the supplied sources explicitly lists professional organizations or advocacy groups that publicly back her [1] [2] [3]. Ballotpedia points readers to the campaign’s published endorsements for detail, indicating the information exists but is not reproduced in these reports [1].
1. Ballotpedia records endorse‑but‑doesn’t‑detail her supporters
Ballotpedia’s candidate entry for Julie Greene explicitly states that “Greene received the following endorsements” and directs readers to view a full list as published by her campaign, yet the Ballotpedia excerpts in the reporting package do not reproduce or name any specific professional organizations or advocacy groups as endorsers [1]. That phrasing confirms there are publicly claimed endorsements, but the provided Ballotpedia material functions as a signpost rather than as evidence of the identities of those organizations, so it cannot be used to answer which professional bodies or advocacy groups backed her without following the campaign’s link [1].
2. Julie Green’s nonprofit background is documented, but it is not an endorsement
Multiple nonprofit registries and tax‑filing sources record Julie Green Ministries as a registered 501(c) organization—GuideStar describes the ministry’s mission and notes required IRS filings while ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer provides the organization’s tax‑filing records and full Form 990 access [3] [2] [4] [5]. Those records establish she leads a public nonprofit entity, which is material context for her public profile, but organizational existence and Form 990 data are not the same as a professional association or advocacy group formally endorsing her campaign; the filings and profiles here do not assert endorsements from external professional or advocacy organizations [3] [4].
3. Campaign materials likely hold the missing endorsement list—sources point there
Ballotpedia’s entry and snippet language repeatedly point back to the candidate’s own published endorsements, implying the definitive list of supporters is hosted on Greene’s campaign or related materials rather than in the civic‑information and nonprofit databases supplied [1]. The campaign website and materials are therefore the most direct next stop for names of professional or advocacy group endorsers, but those specific endorsement names were not included in the documents provided for this analysis [1].
4. Impersonation warnings and limits on public reporting
Julie Green’s organization warns users about impersonators on social media and cautions that many accounts claim to be Julie Green or Julie Green Ministries, a detail the official site publishes to protect followers [6]. That notice is relevant because public claims of endorsements circulating on social media or third‑party sites should be treated cautiously unless corroborated by the campaign’s official endorsement list or reputable third‑party reporting; none of the data excerpts supplied here verifies any such outside endorsements [6].
5. What the available evidence does — and does not — allow one to conclude
Taken together, the records provided allow two firm conclusions: Ballotpedia and the campaign assert that Greene has received endorsements, and Julie Green operates a registered nonprofit with public filings available [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. They do not, however, permit naming any professional organization or advocacy group that has publicly backed her because no source in the provided set lists such organizations by name; asserting specific endorsers would require consulting the campaign’s published endorsement page or other reporting not included here [1].