Which Project 2025 proposals have been enacted into law at the federal level since 2023?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Since the Heritage Foundation published Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership in 2023, multiple elements of its agenda have been reflected in federal actions and personnel choices — for example, Russell Vought, a Project 2025 chapter author, was confirmed to lead the Office of Management and Budget, which oversees the $6.75 trillion federal budget [1]. Available sources document executive orders, agency rule changes, and policy shifts that critics and trackers say mirror Project 2025 priorities, but there is no single, sourced list in these materials that claims which specific Project 2025 proposals were formally enacted into statute by Congress [2] [3] [1].
1. Project 2025: a playbook, not a statute — what the founding documents say
Project 2025 is a 920‑page policy blueprint produced under the Heritage Foundation intended as a road map for a conservative administration; it functions as a playbook for personnel moves, executive actions and legislative priorities rather than a bill that can be “enacted” in one step [2] [4]. The Mandate and related Project 2025 pages present policy prescriptions and staffing databases to help implement those prescriptions if sympathetic leaders gain power [4] [5].
2. Personnel and appointments: immediate and verifiable influence
One clear area where Project 2025’s footprint is documented is personnel. Reporting shows Project 2025 authors and contributors moved into federal leadership roles: Russell Vought, who wrote a key chapter, was confirmed to run OMB, a post that controls federal policy implementation and budgets [1]. That kind of placement is not a law but is a direct channel for a blueprint’s ideas to become policy through executive action and rulemaking [1].
3. Executive actions and agency changes traceable to Project 2025 priorities
Advocacy groups and trackers cite multiple executive orders and agency actions that align with Project 2025 priorities — for example, actions reportedly designed to curtail federal abortion funding and to weaken rules like Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing [1] [3]. The NAACP Legal Defense Fund maps administration actions such as weakening fair housing rules and other regulatory rollbacks that mirror Project 2025 recommendations, though the sources frame these as executive policy changes rather than Congress-passed laws [3].
4. Litigation and watchdog reports: third‑party trackers map implementation, but stop short of legislative claims
Civil‑rights and progressive groups (e.g., Brennan Center, Democracy Forward, NAACP LDF) and coalition trackers catalogue administration steps they say implement Project 2025 proposals — from attempts to expand federal policing authority to moves affecting education, reproductive health funding, and DEI programs [6] [7] [3]. These organizations document regulatory changes, proposed personnel cuts, and executive orders; none of the provided sources present a definitive list of Project 2025 items that were converted into federal statutes by Congress [6] [7] [3].
5. Statutory change vs. administrative implementation: why the difference matters
Project 2025’s authors promote both legislative reforms and executive strategies to reshape the government. Sources repeatedly show the project’s strength is in shaping executive branch appointments and rulemaking, not in delivering wholesale new statutes on Capitol Hill [2] [4] [5]. FactCheck and other explainers emphasize that Project 2025 is a roadmap of proposals and that many outcomes critics warn about arise through executive measures and personnel shifts rather than single acts of Congress [8].
6. What the available sources explicitly do and do not say
Available sources enumerate personnel placements, executive orders, rule changes and advocacy claims that align with Project 2025’s recommendations [1] [3] [6]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive, source‑verified list of Project 2025 proposals that were enacted into federal law by Congress since 2023; if you are asking which individual Project 2025 recommendations were passed as statutes, that explicit mapping is not provided in the cited materials [2] [8].
7. Competing framings and hidden agendas in the reporting
Conservative outlets and Project 2025’s own pages present the project as a practical transition manual; progressive organizations frame it as a threat to civil‑rights and checks and balances, highlighting personnel networks and dark‑money connections [4] [2] [9]. Watchdogs and legal centers document concrete administrative steps taken and treat them as partial implementation; Heritage’s materials portray the project as preparatory rather than an exertion of immediate statutory power [4] [2] [9].
8. Bottom line and next steps for verification
If your goal is to know which exact Project 2025 proposals became federal law, current reporting in these sources does not supply a conclusive, item‑by‑item statutory list [2] [8]. For a definitive answer, cross‑reference Project 2025’s published proposals against the federal Register of enacted statutes and newly signed laws, then check agency rule‑making records and confirmation histories for personnel named in Project 2025 [5] [1]. The sources here document clear influence through appointments and executive action but stop short of claiming a comprehensive statutory enactment list [1] [3].