Who are prominent figures opposing women's suffrage today?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A loose but visible cluster of contemporary figures and influencers have publicly questioned or promoted repealing or restricting the Nineteenth Amendment and women’s universal suffrage; names repeatedly reported include Doug Wilson, Dale Partridge, John Gibbs, Paul Ray Ramsey, Andrew Tate, Paul Ingrassia and Abby Johnson, with amplification from higher‑profile actors such as Pete Hegseth, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows these are a mix of pastors, fringe commentators, online influencers and a few mainstream amplifiers rather than a cohesive political movement with a clear legislative path to repeal [1] [2].
1. Who is being named today as opposing women’s suffrage
Contemporary lists assembled in reporting and encyclopedic summaries single out Doug Wilson (pastor of Christ Church, Moscow, Idaho) as a prominent figure whose comments about repealing the Nineteenth Amendment gained attention after a repost by U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth [1]. Journalistic accounts and aggregations add Dale Partridge (pastor and podcaster), John Gibbs (former Trump administration official), Paul Ray Ramsey (online commentator), Paul Ingrassia (podcast guest cited); fringe celebrity Andrew Tate and anti‑abortion campaigner Abby Johnson — the latter advocating household voting as an alternative — are also named in contemporary reporting as connected to anti‑suffrage rhetoric [1] [2].
2. Who amplified or took the debate mainstream
High‑reach amplifiers who have not always explicitly called to remove women’s vote but who have promoted content undermining universal suffrage include Pete Hegseth, whose repost brought wide attention to Wilson’s video, and tech billionaires discussed in commentary such as Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, both of whom have shared or liked posts that critics say erode faith in universal suffrage or discuss limiting the franchise — coverage that treats their influence as especially consequential because of their reach [1] [3].
3. The rhetoric and stated rationales on offer
The public rationales reported include claims that women’s voting skews public life toward policies critics call “suicidal empathy,” arguments for restoring “household” or restricted voting, and assertions that certain demographics (women, low‑T men, non‑parents) make poorer civic decision‑makers — themes directly attributed in recent reporting to figures like Dale Partridge, Abby Johnson and to posts amplified by Musk’s networks [2] [3] [1].
4. Historical context that matters for interpreting these names
The contemporary phenomenon echoes a long American tradition of organized anti‑suffrage activity: historians and institutional sources note that in the late 19th and early 20th centuries both men and many women organized formally against enfranchising women (for example Josephine Dodge and the National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage), and that anti‑suffrage arguments historically appealed to domestic roles, social stability and race‑based hierarchies — a context that reporters invoke to explain both continuity and difference with today’s actors [4] [5] [6].
5. Limits of the reporting and competing interpretations
The sources show named individuals and episodes of amplification but also make clear there is no practical pathway now to amend or repeal the Nineteenth Amendment, and major outlets emphasize that many cited figures are fringe voices rather than mainstream policymakers [2]. Reporting differs about the seriousness of some players’ intentions: some commentators frame figures like Musk and Thiel as flirting with ideas about restricting suffrage without explicit calls to rescind women’s votes, while other writers treat any such amplification as a dangerous threat worth urgent attention [3] [2].
6. Bottom line — who to watch and what it means
Reporting identifies a small set of contemporary influencers and commentators who have openly questioned or promoted limiting women’s voting rights (Doug Wilson, Dale Partridge, John Gibbs, Paul Ray Ramsey, Paul Ingrassia, Andrew Tate, Abby Johnson) and a handful of amplifiers with broader platforms (Pete Hegseth, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel) whose reach magnifies the debate; however, those sources collectively stress this is a fragmented, largely rhetorical current with historical echoes rather than an organized, legally viable campaign to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment [1] [2] [3] [4]. The evidence in the supplied reporting supports naming the individuals above while also noting important limits: amplification does not equal legislative power, and many claims about broad elite conspiracies are asserted by opinion pieces rather than fully documented institutional efforts [2] [3].