Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Which organizations supported or opposed Proposition 50 in California?

Checked on October 12, 2025

Executive Summary

Proposition 50 drew organized backing from statewide Democratic leaders and major progressive donors while attracting opposition funded largely by conservative billionaires and national GOP-aligned groups; funding totals and coalition claims shifted during September 2025 as campaigns accelerated. Major supporters named in reporting include Governor Gavin Newsom, the California Teachers Association, the Fund for Policy Reform (linked to George Soros), and a coalition organized by the California Donor Table, while principal organized opposition included Charles T. Munger Jr. and the Congressional Leadership Fund [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Big-money backing: Who wrote the largest checks and why this matters

Reporting in late September documented a stark funding gap credited to prominent individuals and institutional donors backing the Yes campaign, with totals reported at roughly $77–77.5 million versus about $30–35 million for No as of those dates; key named donors were George Soros’s Fund for Policy Reform, the California Teachers Association, and venture donors like Michael Morowitz, while Charles T. Munger Jr. emerged as the largest identifiable donor on the No side [1] [4]. These sums matter because they financed statewide advertising and outreach, shaping perceptions of momentum and enabling alliance-building with local grassroots partners such as 45 regional groups working with the California Donor Table [3]. The coverage links fundraising to campaign capacity, highlighting how financial advantage can translate into a broader field operation and greater message saturation ahead of the election [2].

2. Political leadership and party machines: Democrats coalesced, Republicans mobilized

California Democratic leaders, including Governor Gavin Newsom, publicly supported Proposition 50 and helped lead high-profile fundraising and virtual rallies that emphasized countering out-of-state gerrymandering efforts; the Yes campaign mobilized national influencers and state party machinery to amplify its message, raising substantial donations in short order [2] [3]. Conversely, organized No opposition drew support from wealthy conservative donors and national GOP groups like the Congressional Leadership Fund, which contributed millions to oppose the measure, signaling a nationalized contest with out-of-state ideological stakes and spending on both sides [1]. The partisan commitments shaped framing: proponents cast Prop 50 as a defense of California’s voice, while opponents framed it as a power grab and fiscal or structural overreach.

3. Grassroots partnerships and outreach: Local organizations’ role in the yes coalition

The pro-Prop 50 effort reported partnerships with roughly 45 local organizations and targeted demographic outreach, including $1.5 million channeled through the California Donor Table to local grassroots groups, highlighting a strategy blending big-dollar media buys with community-level mobilization [3]. Polling cited by the Latino Community Foundation suggested 46% of Latino registered voters planned to vote yes while substantial shares remained undecided, indicating targeted outreach to communities of color was central to campaign planning [3]. This dual approach reflects a campaign bet that combining elite donors with localized fieldwork would shore up support among diverse voter blocs and close persuasion gaps identified by strategists [3] [2].

4. Media, ethics, and perception: Newsrooms and the controversy over ad buys

The California News Publishers Association’s outreach to Governor Newsom to request ad buys created controversy over perceived media favoritism and ethical optics, raising questions about press independence and whether newspapers were engaging with one side of a high-stakes ballot fight; commentary framed the plea as evidence of the media ecosystem being pulled into partisan spending debates [4]. Coverage flagged that newspapers seeking advertising revenue from the Yes campaign could be seen as aligning with one side, while editorial and nonprofit watchdogs questioned the propriety of such entanglements amid a heated redistricting battle. The controversy illustrates how media business pressures become part of campaign storylines and can influence public trust.

5. Messaging differences: How supporters and opponents framed Proposition 50

Supporters framed Prop 50 as an anti-gerrymandering reform to protect fair representation and blunt out-of-state Republican redistricting efforts, emphasizing election integrity tools and post-election audits; proponents positioned their message around preserving California’s congressional voice against national maneuvers [5] [2]. Opponents countered by portraying the measure as an opportunistic power play and criticized procedural elements and associated costs, seeding doubts among key demographic cohorts including young voters and people of color who polling showed to be less decided or skeptical of the Yes messaging [3]. These divergent frames shaped both fundraising narratives and ground conversations in the weeks leading to the vote.

6. Where the reporting agreed and where it diverged—fact comparisons

Across articles, reporting consistently identified Governor Newsom and major progressive donors backing the Yes side and recognized large conservative donors backing No, with fundraising totals reported in the same general range during late September 2025 [4] [1] [2]. Differences arose in emphasis: some pieces highlighted coalition fieldwork and Latino outreach as tactical strengths [3], while others focused on media ethics or donor identities and the symbolic weight of national actors [4]. Dates cluster in mid-to-late September 2025, so the snapshot reflects campaign dynamics as spending accelerated and outreach intensified ahead of election day [3] [1].

7. Bottom line for readers: Who supported and who opposed Proposition 50

In sum, organized support for Proposition 50 included Governor Gavin Newsom, California Democratic leaders, the California Teachers Association, the Fund for Policy Reform associated with George Soros, the California Donor Table and a coalition of about 45 local groups; opposition drew major funding from Charles T. Munger Jr. and national GOP-aligned groups like the Congressional Leadership Fund, with reporting showing the Yes campaign held a sizable financial edge in late September 2025 [1] [3] [4]. These affiliations and funding flows shaped messaging, outreach, and media dynamics in the closing phase of the campaign [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the key arguments for and against Proposition 50 in California?
Which California state officials publicly endorsed or opposed Proposition 50?
How did Proposition 50 affect the California state budget for 2024?
What was the voter turnout for Proposition 50 in the 2024 California election?
How did Proposition 50 impact environmental policies in California?