Proud boy us terrorist watch list before Jan 6 ever

Checked on January 10, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

There is no evidence in the provided reporting that the U.S. government formally placed the Proud Boys on a U.S. terrorist “watch list” or designated the organization as a terrorist entity prior to January 6, 2021; instead, foreign governments (Canada) and later New Zealand formally designated the group as a terrorist entity, and U.S. prosecutors and congressional investigators treated members as domestic violent extremists after the Capitol attack [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. No U.S. federal terrorist designation or watch‑list placement before Jan. 6 is reported

The materials supplied contain no primary source showing that the U.S. State Department, Treasury, or a federal “terrorist watch list” formally listed the Proud Boys as a terrorist organization before January 6, 2021, and reporting about calls to designate the group as a terrorist organization came after the Capitol attack (Rep. Gottheimer’s push came February 23, 2021) [5] [1].

2. Foreign governments moved faster to use “terrorist” labels

Canada officially added the Proud Boys to its list of terrorist entities on February 3, 2021, weeks after the Capitol attack, making it the first country to do so, and New Zealand followed with a designation in mid‑2022 that explicitly cited Proud Boys activity on January 6 as constituting terrorism under its laws [1] [2] [6].

3. U.S. law enforcement and civil‑society assessments flagged danger without a formal U.S. “terrorist” label

Within the United States, civil‑society groups and some law‑enforcement documents had characterized the Proud Boys as an extremist or violent group: the Southern Poverty Law Center designated them a hate group and internal law‑enforcement memos at times identified members or factions as extremist threats, but those characterizations stopped short of a formal federal terrorist‑entity listing prior to Jan. 6 in the sources provided [7] [4]. Congressional investigators and the Justice Department treated Proud Boys members as criminal conspirators after the riot, documenting planning, hierarchy, and violent actions in the Select Committee report and subsequent prosecutions [3] [8].

4. The Jan. 6 attack changed legal and political treatment of the group

The Capitol breach and the arrests and indictments that followed shifted both domestic and international responses: U.S. prosecutors charged multiple Proud Boys with conspiracy and seditious conspiracy tied directly to January 6, and members were central to calls from lawmakers and advocates for stronger tools to counter violent domestic extremism, including proposals to seek formal terrorist designations or enhanced sanctions [3] [5] [8].

5. Competing narratives and limitations in the record

Advocates and national security writers argued the Proud Boys met criteria for domestic terrorist designation because of organized violence and conspiracy to subvert democracy, and some lawmakers urged State Department action [8] [5]. At the same time, the Proud Boys and some defenders disputed or denied global labels and legal characterizations; the supplied sources do not include any U.S. federal document listing the group as a “terrorist entity” or putting the organization on a U.S. terrorist watchlist prior to January 6, 2021, and therefore this analysis cannot assert such a U.S. action occurred [4] [1].

Want to dive deeper?
Which U.S. agencies have the authority to designate domestic groups as terrorist organizations and how have they been used?
What specific charges did U.S. prosecutors bring against Proud Boys members after Jan. 6, and what evidence supported seditious conspiracy claims?
How did Canada and New Zealand justify their Proud Boys terrorist designations in official documents?