What public allegations of sexual misconduct involving minors have been made against Donald Trump?

1. What the reporting actually says about allegations involving minors

A widely cited summary of allegations compiled in secondary sources reports that some accounts describe sexual activity involving underage girls and that witnesses or contemporaries have been quoted saying minors were present; for example, reporting summarized on Wikipedia and in the book All the President's Women describes allegations that minors were provided drugs and that acquaintances of Trump said they saw him engage in sexual activity with girls, with one named witness identified as model and actor Andy Lucchesi and another unnamed fashion photographer speaking on background ^[1].

2. The provenance of those claims and how they were published

The most detailed public compilation that the available sources reference is a 2019 book, All the President's Women, which added dozens of allegations to the public record and is the provenance cited for the claims about minors in reporting synthesized on Wikipedia; that book reported interviews with individuals who said they saw or knew of sexual activity involving young women described as minors and offered allegations about illicit drugs being provided to them ^[1].

3. Legal status and evidentiary limitations reported by scholars and journalists

Academic commentary and legal analysis note that many allegations—particularly those alleging misconduct involving minors—have not resulted in civil or criminal remedies, and scholars have argued victims in such cases have often not been afforded legal redress; Ruthann Robson’s review of the public record explicitly states that women who allege Trump committed sexual misconduct against them when they were minors have generally not received remedies through courts or political processes ^[2].

4. Patterns of corroboration, named witnesses, and anonymous sources

Some reporting relies on contemporaneous witnesses or secondary witnesses rather than direct complainants; the Wikipedia summary cites two men who claimed acquaintance with Trump during the relevant decade and who described seeing sexual activity involving girls, while one of those men is named (Andy Lucchesi) and the other spoke on condition of anonymity—an evidentiary pattern that leaves open questions about verifiability and the scope of corroboration ^[1].

5. Trump’s public response and competing narratives

Trump has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct, including those summarized in broader compilations, and has publicly framed accusations as media bias, conspiracies, or political smears; these denials are consistently reported alongside the allegations in summaries of the public record ^[1].

6. How commentators assess the public record and gaps that remain

Legal scholars and commentators have urged a fuller reckoning—some calling for a formal inquiry or "misogyny report"—to systematically evaluate allegations and recommend remedies, precisely because the publicly available accounts, especially those alleging misconduct with minors, remain fragmented and often outside the reach of adjudication or public accountability mechanisms ^[2].

7. What can and cannot be concluded from the available sources

From the sources provided, it is accurate to say that public reporting includes allegations that Trump engaged in sexual conduct involving persons described as minors and that at least two men have been quoted alleging they observed such conduct; it is not possible, based on the documents in this packet alone, to determine the full factual truth of each allegation or the outcomes of any related investigations beyond what these sources report, and many of the allegations remain contested or unproven in court ^{[1] [2]}.