Who is paying for the retrofit of the Quatar donated plane?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The original statement inquires about who is paying for the retrofit of the Qatar-donated plane. According to [1], the Air Force plans to use leftover ICBM funds to help pay for refurbishing the Qatari-donated plane into a new Air Force One, with the cost estimated to be less than $400 million [1]. Similarly, [2] confirms that the Air Force is using money previously given to its Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program to convert the Qatari luxury jet into an Air Force One, with the cost estimated to be less than $400 million [2]. However, [3] reports that the cost of refurbishing the Qatari jet is classified, but lawmakers have speculated that it could cost as much as $1 billion, with the Air Force using money from the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program to fund the conversion [3]. [4] and [5] also estimate the cost to be less than $400 million, with the expenses already accounted for through the broader VC-25B presidential aircraft program [4] and the cost being covered by the US Air Force [5]. [6] also states that the cost will 'probably' be less than $400 million, with the cost being covered by the Air Force [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key point missing from the original statement is the estimated timeline for the retrofit, which [2] mentions is expected to take just short of a year [2], while [5] states that completion will range from several months to more than two years [5]. Additionally, [3] and [3] highlight that the cost of refurbishing the plane is classified, which could lead to speculation and uncertainty about the actual cost [3]. Furthermore, [7] mentions that the cost to retrofit the plane could be astronomical, but does not provide a specific figure or information on who will pay for the retrofit [7]. The Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program is also mentioned as a source of funding for the retrofit, but the implications of using funds from this program are not explored in depth [1] [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading in implying that the cost of the retrofit is a simple or straightforward issue, when in fact the cost is estimated to be less than $400 million by some sources [1] [2] [4] [5] [6], but classified and potentially as high as $1 billion according to others [3]. Additionally, the statement does not account for the potential trade-offs of using funds from the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program to pay for the retrofit, which could have implications for the US military's nuclear capabilities [1] [3]. The Air Force and US government may benefit from framing the cost of the retrofit as less than $400 million, as this could be seen as a more manageable and justifiable expense [1] [2] [4] [5] [6], while lawmakers and critics may benefit from highlighting the potential for higher costs and the use of funds from the Sentinel program [3].