Which U.S. lobbying firms have registered on behalf of Qatar since 2015 and what did they disclose?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Since 2015 Qatar has hired a constellation of U.S. lobbying and PR shops — from high‑profile K Street firms to boutique political consultancies — and these firms’ Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filings and lobbying disclosures show retained contracts, monthly and lump‑sum payments, and lists of activities including meetings with Congress, media outreach and public relations work [1][2][3]. Reporting and public databases identify named registrants such as Moran Global Strategies, Ballard Partners, BGR Group, Mercury Public Affairs, Avenue Strategies, GRV Strategies and others, and disclose specific payments, restrictions and outreach targets in their filings [4][5][6][7].
1. What “registered on behalf of Qatar” means and the reporting limits
“Registered” in this context refers to firms that filed under FARA or disclosed lobbying for the Government of Qatar or Qatari entities in the U.S. Justice Department and congressional lobbying databases; OpenSecrets and Justice Department indexes aggregate these filings but are not exhaustive for opaque consulting arrangements, and several reports caution that additional informal influence work can fall outside public disclosure [2][1][8].
2. The main firms named repeatedly in reporting and filings
Multiple outlets and disclosure aggregators identify Moran Global Strategies as a long‑standing Qatari contractor — Moran disclosed roughly $560,000 from Qatar in a semi‑annual FARA report — and list Ballard Partners, BGR Group and Mercury Public Affairs among other prominent Washington firms retained by Doha [4][5][4][8]. Independent and investigative pieces also name Avenue Strategies and its principal Barry P. Bennett as a prior recipient of millions from Qatar, documented in DOJ and media accounts [9][6]. Reporting on 2024–25 work cites GRV Strategies and a register of outreach linking that firm to media pitching for Qatar [7].
3. What those disclosures say the firms did and were paid
Filed disclosures and reporting show a mix of activities: direct lobbying with Congressional offices and executive‑branch staff, media and PR campaigns, outreach to conservative media, and facilitation of Doha’s diplomatic messaging; the FDD counted more than 285 congressional engagements by Qatar’s paid agents between October 2023 and April 2024 on hostage‑negotiation issues, based on DOJ disclosures [3]. Specific payment figures reported include Moran’s $560,000 disclosure [4], Avenue Strategies receiving about $2.1 million in earlier contracts [9], and Ventry’s firm reporting $80,000 per month from Qatar according to press reporting and FARA summaries [7][7].
4. Claimed restrictions and media outreach revealed in filings
Some contracts disclosed in news reports contained client‑imposed restrictions — for example, a contract noted by reporting barred a firm from taking other Middle East or North Africa government clients without Qatar’s consent — while contemporaneous documents and reporting show systematic media pitching tied to circulation of Qatar’s messaging in conservative outlets [7]. OpenRecords analyses and FARA docs compiled by outlets and databases show firms declaring both meetings with members of Congress and targeted communications campaigns as part of their work [7][2].
5. Compliance problems, contested practices and competing perspectives
DoJ records and investigative accounts also flag instances of problematic or undisclosed activity: reporting says Barry Bennett and Douglas Watts provided misleading information about their Qatar work and that Watts failed to disclose lobbying, per Justice Department notes and secondary reporting [9]. Critics argue Qatar’s outlays — tallied in different audits and database tallies variously as tens of millions since 2015 — amount to influence buying; Qatar and its advocates frame the work as standard diplomacy and public affairs to repair reputation and push mediation roles [6][10][8].
6. What remains unresolved and how to read the record
Public databases like OpenSecrets list dozens of registrants and aggregate spending but vary on totals and time windows, and investigative outlets have produced differing firm lists and dollar figures, meaning any catalogue here is representative rather than exhaustive [2][1][8]. The sources used identify core names and specific disclosures — Moran Global Strategies’ $560,000, Avenue’s multimillion receipts, Ventry’s $80,000/month, GRV Strategies’ media outreach, and hundreds of documented congressional engagements — but a full, up‑to‑the‑moment roster requires direct queries of DOJ FARA records and OpenSecrets snapshots [4][9][7][3][2].